496
Pull over (jlai.lu)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/comics@lemmy.ml
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 109 points 2 years ago (5 children)

If you saw this and thought it was horny, that might just be a you thing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 74 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You expect me to look at a shirtless deer in denim jeans with with a buff chest and choker and a cheetah in a skintight uniform with big tiddies and a fat ass and supple thighs and not become aroused? Sicko

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [+] 55 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The art style screams furry artist

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Let's not forget this art is on the top of all time list of the furry_irl subreddit, and I even thought this was posted on a furry_irl communities before looking at this community's name.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well yeah. Furry != horny though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Nah, it's pretty obvious the cheetah is wearing skin tight clothes for asthetic reasons. It might have been habit rather than design, but the artist definitely chose to draw titty-shaped torso rather than cop-shaped torso.

    It's not even fucking close either. They drew more titty shape than literal fetish wear shows, much less an actual cop.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I dunno. I'm a woman and I didn't notice the skin-tight thing until it was pointed out, but looking back at it, wouldn't any clothes do that at 90 mph?

    ACAB but it doesn't look horny to me. She's just woman-shaped to me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    wouldn't any clothes do that at 90 mph?

    Β―\_(ツ)_/Β― Maybe, but it still managed to not look right despite that. It feels more like a failure to communicate speed with the art rather than intending horny anyways. That's part of the problem though. The image looks horny first, and speedy second, or really even third.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Woah, hey, easy there. You're starting to take this personally. Dial it back a little.

    I genuinely cannot believe that people still care about this in the year 2024.

    Nobody cares that it's a horny image. This is the internet in 2024. The artist just managed to hit that sweet spot of genuine effort + not quite skilled enough = unintentionally hilarious. It's bad movie night, but for comics.

    We're all laughing at the stripper cop who the artist genuinely expected us to take seriously, not complaining that there's clutches pearls big titty cheetah cops!

    Imagine if some of the more "notorious" disney films came out today, people would lose their minds.

    You mean like zootopia?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You can't really compare real life people's proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal. To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all. And believe me, if a furry wanted to draw something suggestive, there would be no discussion as to its horny status. They aren't known for subtlety.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all.

    You've missed the point; it doesn't matter if the author intended to draw a horny photo. I already agreed on that point in my above comment. The point is that the situation makes no sense for a horny image, but it still looks like one anyways.

    You can't really compare real life people's proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal.

    I can when the animal has bigger tittys than most strippers do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    To be fair, the tiny waist is pretty accurate to how to the animal looks. Giving the cop big titties and skin-tight uniform might actually be the best way to portray an anthropomorphised cheetah.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent