you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

You can't really compare real life people's proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal. To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all. And believe me, if a furry wanted to draw something suggestive, there would be no discussion as to its horny status. They aren't known for subtlety.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    To me its clear there was no intention for this image to be sexual at all.

    You've missed the point; it doesn't matter if the author intended to draw a horny photo. I already agreed on that point in my above comment. The point is that the situation makes no sense for a horny image, but it still looks like one anyways.

    You can't really compare real life people's proportions to a cartoon of an anthropomorphic animal.

    I can when the animal has bigger tittys than most strippers do.

  • source
  • parent