▲ 781 ▼ EU attempt to sneak through new encryption-eroding law slammed by Signal, politicians (www.theregister.com) submitted 2 years ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world 106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 77 points 2 years ago (10 children) You can't murder a room full of children with pgp. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 10 points 2 years ago Say that again after you sit the same IT exams as I did. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Not with that kind of attitude! permalink fedilink source parent [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -35 points 2 years ago (7 children) I already have a chainsaw for that kind of thing, that does this have to do with guns and encryption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 27 points 2 years ago (6 children) Yeah, that's the point. What do guns have to do with encryption? I could say "If you outlaw beards, only outlaws will have beards" and it will make as much sense as your original post. I appreciate that you have a weird fetish for violence but you don't have to shoe-horn it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -14 points 2 years ago (5 children) Privacy and guns can be used for defense. Beards generally don't affect that (though Alexander was of a different opinion and made his soldiers shave so that they couldn't be grabbed by the beard ; I think same was the reasoning for Roman soldiers shaving their beards and other hair). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) You can’t murder a room full of children with pgp. I'll just say it again in the hope that it might dawn on you that the two things are not even remotely similar enough that you can say "this also works for guns". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -9 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn't strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 10 points 2 years ago Say that again after you sit the same IT exams as I did. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago Not with that kind of attitude! permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -35 points 2 years ago (7 children) I already have a chainsaw for that kind of thing, that does this have to do with guns and encryption? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 27 points 2 years ago (6 children) Yeah, that's the point. What do guns have to do with encryption? I could say "If you outlaw beards, only outlaws will have beards" and it will make as much sense as your original post. I appreciate that you have a weird fetish for violence but you don't have to shoe-horn it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -14 points 2 years ago (5 children) Privacy and guns can be used for defense. Beards generally don't affect that (though Alexander was of a different opinion and made his soldiers shave so that they couldn't be grabbed by the beard ; I think same was the reasoning for Roman soldiers shaving their beards and other hair). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) You can’t murder a room full of children with pgp. I'll just say it again in the hope that it might dawn on you that the two things are not even remotely similar enough that you can say "this also works for guns". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -9 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn't strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 27 points 2 years ago (6 children) Yeah, that's the point. What do guns have to do with encryption? I could say "If you outlaw beards, only outlaws will have beards" and it will make as much sense as your original post. I appreciate that you have a weird fetish for violence but you don't have to shoe-horn it into every conversation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -14 points 2 years ago (5 children) Privacy and guns can be used for defense. Beards generally don't affect that (though Alexander was of a different opinion and made his soldiers shave so that they couldn't be grabbed by the beard ; I think same was the reasoning for Roman soldiers shaving their beards and other hair). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) You can’t murder a room full of children with pgp. I'll just say it again in the hope that it might dawn on you that the two things are not even remotely similar enough that you can say "this also works for guns". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -9 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn't strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -14 points 2 years ago (5 children) Privacy and guns can be used for defense. Beards generally don't affect that (though Alexander was of a different opinion and made his soldiers shave so that they couldn't be grabbed by the beard ; I think same was the reasoning for Roman soldiers shaving their beards and other hair). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) You can’t murder a room full of children with pgp. I'll just say it again in the hope that it might dawn on you that the two things are not even remotely similar enough that you can say "this also works for guns". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -9 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn't strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago (4 children) You can’t murder a room full of children with pgp. I'll just say it again in the hope that it might dawn on you that the two things are not even remotely similar enough that you can say "this also works for guns". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -9 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn't strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[+] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -9 points 2 years ago (3 children) I've already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn't strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children) What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn't ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 years ago (1 child) They are both intended for defense. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Hammerheart@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago I think it's safe to say guns are an offensive weapon permalink fedilink source parent