550
Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset (www.gamespot.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/games@lemmy.world
166 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Eh, I liked it better than 3.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    talk about damning with faint praise..

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    I had fun with both. Fallout 4's flaws are still there, but if you're going to make a punching bag out of one of them, 4 is a better game than 3, IMO.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    No ones disagreeing with that.

    Fallout 3 was all around an inferior game. Not just an inferior fallout, but an inferior game, compared to 4.

    Mostly cause Fallout 3 was a disjointed mess.

    But just because Fallout 4 is better by comparison, Doesnt mean fallout 4 is good.

    I hate beets. But give me the choice between a bowl of shit and a bowl of beets, and put a gun to my head? I'll eat the beets gladly and happily. Doesnt mean I love them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Neither is shit. 4 is way better. 1, 2, and New Vegas are better still. But 3 doesn't tend to come up in these conversations when people talk about Bethesda Fallouts being worse. They always go to 4, and that surprises me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •