you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 2 years ago (6 children)

CRTs perfectly demonstrate engineering versus design. All of their technical features are nearly ideal - but they're heavy as shit, turn a kilowatt straight into heat, and take an enormous footprint for a tiny window. I am typing this on a 55" display that's probably too close. My first PC had a 15" monitor that was about 19" across, and I thought the square-ass 24" TV in the living room was enormous. They only felt big because they stuck out three feet from the nearest wall!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    The heavy part truly cannot be overstated. I recently got a tiny CRT, not even a cubic foot in size. It's about the same weight as my friends massive OLED TV. Of course, OLED is particularly light, but still. It's insane!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    And it's a vacuum tube. How does nothing weigh this much?!

    Plasma screens weren't much better, at first. I had a 30" one circa 2006, maybe three inches thick, and it you'd swear it was solid metal. A decade later we bought a couple 32" LCD TVs, then a few more because they were so cheap, and the later ones weighed next to nothing. Nowadays - well, I walked this 55" up and down a flight of stairs by myself, and the only hard parts were finding somewhere to grab and not bonking any walls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments