Science

13175 readers

15 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Article proposes variant of current ΛCDM cosmological model that makes the universe twice as old (doi.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/1721793

The article introduces a dynamic cosmological constant in the current ΛCDM cosmological model to account for some data from the James Webb telescope. The new model would have the age of the universe at ~27 billion years.

This is interesting. Unfortunately some popular science magazines are already presenting it as a fact...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Age estimation is a tricky thing - there are no brass labels on distant galaxies showing their age, or if there are, the letters are too small to see. There are several different methods, and while there's some disagreement between them, it's on the magnitude of 0.1Gyr, not 13.7+/-13.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Feel free to give more references about these points, I'm always happy to read more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia is a good starting point: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe . I'm not an expert on the topic, but if I'd like to dig deeper, I'd visit Amazon, look for cosmology books, pick something that's expansive, looks like a textbook, plus point if the title contains the word 'introduction' (you'll see the irony inside). It's the best if you find something from after 2010 (after Planck and WMAP missions). I found Weinberg: Cosmology, but that's from 2008. If you have your favorite textbook, check it out from the local library, but make sure NOT to download it from Library Genesis (http://libgen.is/ is the site to avoid) because that would cause the publisher financial losses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What I don't understand is where you found the magnitude of 0.1 Gyr. According to Weinberg (§1.8), for instance, our galaxy only is around 13 Gyr. As Harrison reports (Table 5.3), the Earth alone is around 5 Gyr, and the universe from 10 to 20 Gyr. Maybe it was a typo in your comment?

Great recommendations about books, thank you. As a physicist I take Wikipedia with more than a pinch – say several kg – of salt, because it frequently contains incorrect or outdated things, anyone can write whatever they please there, and there's nobody behind it that you can write to asking for clarification or where they got their statements from...