this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
68 points (94.7% liked)

Privacy

31886 readers
584 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (8 children)

The tentative deal is expected to broker a compromise between congressional Democrats and Republicans by preempting state data protection laws

We’ll have to wait and see what the real bill looks like, but this would literally be worse than nothing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I can’t tell you how encouraging it is to see this. Yes, absolutely. Preemption of state laws would be disastrous. I can not fathom why, while states are actually passing privacy laws (hello all you amazing data broker laws coming online esp in CA) we would want to make sure the only entities that can legislate privacy into the future are congress. It’s fucking madness.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is absolutely no reason they can’t pass a federal law and then still allow states to have a more restrictive law. It is stupid to add a preemption barring more stringent laws.

But really no laws are strict enough against data harvesting companies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Republicans and bought and paid for democrats. That’s the reason. We’re never getting a federal privacy bill with bipartisan support unless it’s preemptive of stronger state law. It’s a shit deal and that industry likes it should tell you everything you need to know

load more comments (5 replies)