[–] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

"Harry Potter Audiobook Packs Instantly customize your Pixel with Harry Potter Audiobook Packs to celebrate the release of Harry Potter: The Full-Cast Audio Editions on Audible. One tap changes your wallpaper, icons, and sounds with elements from the audiobooks - no wand required. To begin your journey to Hogwarts, all eligible Pixel users will receive a two-month Audible free trial.(2)"

(Source: https://support.google.com/pixelphone/thread/466181739/september-2026-pixel-drop?hl=en)

Why the hell is this garbage being bundled woth my OS?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

    Thanks for the heads up!

    [Edit: Why the fuck is this app installing a Harry Potter Audible ad on my phone? Fuck you Google.]

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago

    Yup. Imagine having the ability to be heard by so many and choosing to stay quiet.

    One doesn't always need to listen to or agree with the opinions of artists, but an artist who doesn't share their opinions is creating product, not art.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    C'mon now, Sheeran is a huge name with huge power. He likely didn't push for booting Macklemore, but he did fuck all to tell the promoter and stadium owners to pound sand and keep him on the tour. Promoters and stadium owners don't make money without a product and Sheeran is huge product - Bland, spineless product that stands for nothing, but product.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    "I choose to use my fame and platform to be a place of safety and sanctuary, to maintain diplomacy and keep conversations open, not closed. If we only focus on shouting the loudest, nothing will ever change. There are different approaches to being an advocate for change."

    Fuck off, Ed.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    A bit late to things, but Angine de Poitrine, Black Mastiff, Alien Metal by King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard, Ayla Brook and the Sound Men, IDLES. Some local to me and a bit all over the map, but I like to change things up fairly often. What about you, OP?

  • source
  •  

    A city councillor is calling for a new fee to charge developers for each tree cut down while constructing new neighbourhoods in the city’s outskirts.

    Ward papastew Coun. Michael Janz will have a motion up for debate at an upcoming council meeting, he said. The motion calls for a fee per tree removed in new developments. It does not cover trees lost to infill, which a separate proposed bylaw may address.

    Janz said there’s several benefits to putting a price on trees. Aside from absorbing carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, providing a no-cost means to reduce the city’s carbon footprint, trees also help reduce the urban heat island-effect by providing shade.

    Janz added the city already has dollar assessments for trees removed from established lots, but when that same value is applied to flora in new development areas, the result is millions of dollars worth of habitat. By ignoring that value, Janz said the city is effectively subsidizing developers to continue urban sprawl.

    “When you put up new neighbourhoods you’re destroying wetlands and intact ecosystems. One new development can be cutting down hundreds of trees,” he said.

    “Some of these trees are very old and worth thousands of dollars. These costs are not being reflected.”

    This isn’t the only tree bylaw being considered by council. Mayor Andrew Knack put forward a motion to require permits to remove trees from established lots within the city limits as a response to concerns brought up over some infill developments.

    A report by the energy transition and climate resilience committee to council in 2023 noted redeveloping existing properties can save between 30 to 50 per cent of emissions compared to building out new lots.

    It notes a single mature tree can pull roughly 21 kilograms of CO2 from the atmosphere annually, which is a drop in the bucket compared to the 20.7 metric tonnes of CO2 generated by an average Edmonton family, meaning you need nearly 1,000 trees to offset the emissions of a single household. In other words, the report noted it’s more environmentally friendly to cut down a few trees in an infill development, which avoids a greenfield development, than to clear out a wetland or forest for a new neighbourhood.