Well i dont know if you tell the truth, but obviously you know more of this than me. I will still not eat beef or cut a lot the consumption because it is the environmetalist consensus. Maybe you tell the truth and in 10 years they say eating beef is not that bad for what you say, but to be save i will not eat it and i will be happy if someone reduce their beef intake

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago

    There is no additional warming because methane breaks down in the atmosphere eventually, so if we generate x quantity in 2026 and the same quantity in 2030, global warming will not increase. That does not mean that the stable amount of methane in the atmosphere right now is low and does not contribute to climate change. And if we consume more livestock due to an increase of population, the warming will increase. This is what i understand

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Im sure this is not enough to compensate the enormous quantity of methane the cows make. If not please show me evidence. Having one billion cows is not natural and we are suffering the consequences and grass does not absorb that much carbon.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (17 children)

    Even taking care of them, cows emit so much methane. Its on their nature and when there is one billion of cows, the carbon footprint is a disaster. Look it up on internets, cows seems harmless but they contaminate a lot, its a fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›