In an unforeseen turn of events, Twitter has decided to test user patience by cloistering tweets behind a sign-in wall

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 93 points 3 years ago (18 children)

Twitter was one of the few socials where government agencies could publish to the masses. Everyday Twitter erodes its worth for short-term wealth.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 3 years ago (16 children)

    In hindsight, it seems absurd that we collectively trust a for-profit company to disseminate official information. Governments should probably take this opportunity to spin up their own Mastodon instances and migrate away from Twitter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago* (11 children)

    Germany of all countries has dippped into it: https://social.bund.de/

    Not quite sure how this works without fax machines, but it does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Judging by the number of German posts I see on here as well, it seems Germany is very receptive to the idea of the fediverse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    Yeah, I'm with you 100%. The same thing could be said about reputable news organizations. And really, there's no better "verification" than people and agencies having their accounts on servers tied to domains that they own.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Everyday Twitter erodes its worth for short-term wealth.

    This is, and will always be, the main push of capitalism. This isn't some cute new term like "enshittification" or something, this is just good ol fashion rent seeking and it's capitalism working as intended.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    “Oh no, I can’t read anything on Twitter!”

    -No one with good mental health.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    In areas experiencing ongoing conflict where maintream media is either muzzled/ unable to keep up, twitter is used by people & journalists to provide updates. In countries with dictatorial governments where the mainstream media cannot be trusted , twitter (&other SM) are used to organize protests and discussions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 38 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Musk claimed that it's temporary. Either way this is an absolute disaster. This must be costing them insane amounts of money.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    "we were getting data pillaged" ... LOL I wonder what on earth that means in his feeble mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Just some deranged rich snob who thinks UGC is .. his? Kinda sad if you think about it. People posted on Twitter with the expectation of it being public, not some man's sandbox.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    "Temporary" in corpo-speak means permanent if it generates profit and there-were-some-technical-issues if it doesn't, so this is just Felon Muskrat testing the waters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Because that works so well for Pinterest right? I mean, we all have Pinterest accounts so we can access all that content on Pinterest don't we?

    Oh... we don't? People add -site:pinterest.com to their google searches to avoid the site entirely? Well then... dang.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Twitter is going even harder than Pinterest. They're not even showing a preview of the content, they're just immediately redirecting users to a login page before seeing anything at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    This is a much more extreme version of the same reason I never used Quora. I'd be allowed on one page, but after that, clicking on any internal link in the site would push a "create an account" dialogue and wouldn't let me click off to see the content. The way around that was just reloading the page, but the irritation and tiny extra step was enough to stop me from browsing that site. Just checked right now and Quora doesn't do this on PC, but it does on my phone.

    Now Twitter won't let you on the site at all without logging in.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 years ago

    LinusTechTips just had an issue with this on WAN show tonight where Luke was trying to show a video on Twitter but he wasn't signed in on his stream laptop and Linus was remote so he couldn't share his screen.

    Luckily the creator of the video they wanted to show had also posted it to YouTube so they were able to show it anyway, but it still disrupted the flow of the show and led them to not be able to use the platform as a news source.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    saw this too! looks like it broke a ton of tweet embeds too... Muskrat says its to mitigate scrapers but--this feels heavy handed

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    What damage do web scrapers actually cause Twitter? I don't understand Elon's logic in this move.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago*

    Extra traffic that their infrastructure can't handle since he fired all the people that knew how.

    Like reddit, he also probably sees it as losing millions of dollars for data he wants to be paid for.

    So losing money from degraded services and losing potential money from data being taken.

    What's worth more - the loss of ad revenue from walled login, or the loss of potential revenue selling the data

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago

    There's no way they cause more damage than what they have done now. The vast majority of users (and eyes on ads, etc) are not going to have accounts. The majority of accounts that might pay money only do so because lots of people (who may not be logged in) see them.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    I mean they have to protect all that content that they've been given for free, right?

    • spez probably
  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Guess I’m not going to Twitter anymore

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    Good! This is a true death knell.

  • source
  • Good. Finally that one friend of mine will stop posting Twitter links and I can blacklist it again.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago

    Good, faster Twitter dies, the better.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Holy shit, I thought it was just a bug on my end. Sometimes I wonder: what has ELON been smoking?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    It’s starting to feel like LinkedIn. Can’t view a page without the person getting notified you looked.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    Does this make it impossible to read posts from accounts that have blocked you in incognito mode?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    The walled gardens are closing their gates...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›