top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 178 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Remember kids, if buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Remember kids, if buying is owning, piracy still isn't stealing. You can make infinite copies of digital media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    i really hate how they call it a 'library', very disingenuous if it's all on their servers and predicated on their fucking license agreements

    what if real libraries had to throw away books because harpercollins got pissy. would anyone stand for it? (probably yes)

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You mean like southern states banning books because they are "offensive"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Ironically, the christian Bible is one of the most offensive books there is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    because of all the socialist propaganda in it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    and the massive jizzing donkey dicks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 62 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Want me to buy your media legally? Oh please, this is tremendously easy to do for a corporation!

    • Downloadable files (you have files, right? Otherwise how are you streaming out the stuff)
    • ...with open codecs (you are using an open codec right? Otherwise you have to encode your stuff like 10 times for 10 different devices each with its own idiosyncrasy)
    • ...without DRM (you have clean copies right? it'd not be smart to base a business model on files you can't open, see the above)
    • ...at an aggregate price that's lower than paying for TV cable (you can cash in only a bit, right? It's digital media and your competition is literally over-the-air TV with extra steps, it's not like you have the mother of pearl of cancer cures here)
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In other words, media as a "service" makes more money than media as a one-point sale. Why should they sell you a one-point solution when the service model makes more money for the shareholders? I love the shareholder economy; it makes all our lives better and makes us focus on what really matters at the end of the day, which is, of course, profits for people who already have too much money. :) very cool

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They exist to fuck over artists and the viewers as much as they can get away with.

    I just decided I’m perfectly comfortable fucking the media companies over first.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They know. They simply do not care.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    There is an easy fix here:

    Require mergers to refund customers impacted as part of the merger.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 46 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I wish guides about cracking DRM for legally purchased content were more popular

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The reason they aren't is because methods for cracking DRM like Widevine are kept extremely secret so that the exploits don't get patched. It does mean that a lot of content is locked to whatever the scene decides is worth their time to crack and distribute, but if anyone made the methods they use public, they would stop working very quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    This happened with a version of Denuvo. Someone leaked an unobfuscated cracked version of a game (I think it was Need for Speed), giving Denuvo the opportunity to study how their protection got cracked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What does Widevine actually do? You may not be able to download directly but you can just use OBS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    You'll get worse quality. Widevine doesn't let you play 4K content on unapproved systems. It's also way less convenient. Obviously, pirates are not affected because they can just download Star.Wars.XII.Galactic.Boogaloo.WEBRIP.4K-DarkNaruto69.mkv, it's only an issue if you try to watch content legally for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Feels like “buy” should be in quotes

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There absolutely needs to be a law that forces companies to make this abundantly clear and make the usage of "buy" illegal in those cases. It should be "rent" or "purchase temporary license."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yuuup. It's basic consumer protection. Imagine if a car dealership were allowed to do what we let media companies get away with. You go to the dealership, sign a contract that you didn't fully read, and then ten years later Toyota shows up to steal your car because clause 78 of section G(4) says that the manufacturer reserves the right to repossess anything they made at any time. They wouldn't be able to finish stealing that car before a thousand hungry lawyers ate them alive. Why do we let media companies do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • They wouldn’t be able to finish stealing that car before a thousand hungry lawyers ate them alive. Why do we let media companies do that?

    They would probably actually have a decent shot at getting away with it, at least at first.

    And to answer your question, it's because the anger that companies generate by doing this shit ends up turning into piracy. Why would you try to punish a corp for doing this (likely wasting your time) when a cheap VPN and basic tech literacy gets you what you want?

    The effort ratios are way out of wack when it comes to digital products. It's easy to get around digital bullshitery, not so much in the real world where we are all car dependant.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I will genuinely never pay for a streaming service again lmao

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    This kind of shitfuckery has been going on for as long as DRM has been around and yet people still fall for the scam.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Making their products harder to use, while making them more expensive

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    As opposed to buying it illegally, or stealing it legally?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›