top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 2 years ago (20 children)

So, do we get to start calling what's happening everywhere world war 3 or is there like some committee that meets on this?

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Once some major players start conscripting people I think it'd be reasonable to call it WW3. This is the preamble

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Hasn't russia been conscripting for a couple of years now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (10 children)
  • [+] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Well it did say major players, plural. If you have major players directly in opposition and both feeling the need for conscription...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago*

    Iran has always had mandatory military service for men 18+. You can buy out if you're rich, but they've been drafting for years.

    And Iran is arguably the #3 major player ahead of Israel who wants to keep their military action at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    whether you or me like them or not, they are a major player.

    No Russia is not a major player. Remember those estimates about Russia taking Ukraine in a week, two weeks tops? Those estimates were based on Russia being a near peer. That assessment was incorrect. Russia is not a near peer.

    Also Russia's capabilities have been significantly diminished because of the war in Ukraine. They can't project power anymore. Russia is devolving down to the level of North Korea. They have nukes, so have to be considered, but no real capability to project power. Not a major player.

    And other countries are involved. China is somewhat involved on the diplomatic front. But guess what their priorities are? They're against Iran's "Axis of Resistance" attacking shipping routes between Europe and Asia. Because obviously.

    So it's basically just Russia+Iran against everyone else in the world. At this point it seems like Iran is struggling to keep their proxies under control. Not exactly WW3.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Conscripting and openly killing one another* as in us on russia or china type shit would be more fair I guess haha

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 44 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    U.S. military forces today conducted strikes on seven facilities, which included more than 85 targets in Iraq and Syria, that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and affiliated militias use to attack U.S. forces. This is the start of our response. The President has directed additional actions to hold the IRGC and affiliated militias accountable for their attacks on U.S. and Coalition Forces.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Need to make space for the raiders which came in early and under budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Hopefully, they don't lose 1/3rd of their navy accidentally... again.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Why are you hoping that they don't? Given the shenanigans the Iranian navy has been up to, promoting much of it to submersible status would be a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    Well, to be honest, this was a sarcastic comment to the time the US did accidentally sink more of their navy than intended. (A little more than 1/3 if their operational force.) The original goal was only 4 platforms IIRC. It may have grown a scotch before the end.

    Which probably doesn't mean much to the sailors. Hind sight being 20/20 and all. Still a bit of an oops.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    The attacks are the first of many expected to take place.

    Washington Post's Dan Lamothe has said that while the U.S. struck more than 85 individual targets in Iraq and Syria, these were spread just eight general locations in those two countries.

    U.S. officials have stressed that there is no plans currently to strike targets in Iran.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 2 years ago
    [+] 2 points 2 years ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›