top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 112 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

And the worst part is when it actually does and you have no fucking idea what went wrong before.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 105 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    That's step zero: rule out black magic

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Those damn cosmic rays flipping my bits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I wonder if there's an available OS that parity checks every operation, analogous to what's planned for Quantum computers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Unrelated, but the other day I read that the main computer for core calculation in Fukushima's nuclear plant used to run a very old CPU with 4 cores. All calculations are done in each core, and the result must be exactly the same. If one of them was different, they knew there was a bit flip, and can discard that one calculation for that one core.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 71 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Me: "Hmm... No... No the code is good, it's the compiler that's wrong."

    runs again

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 38 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Yeah, but sometimes it works.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 45 points 2 years ago

    The first is a surprise; the second is testing.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Hmm..you may be right. I'll get my Hispanic friend to run it and see if he gets the same result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    i sometimes do that so i can inspect the error messages on a cleared terminal

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    One of my old programs produces a broken build unless you then compile it again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just had that happen to me today. Setup logging statements and reran the job, and it ran successfully.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (8 children)
    ======== 37/37 tests passing ========
    
  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    The crazy thing is that sometimes this just works...

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago

    If that doesn't work, sometimes your computer just needs a rest. Take the rest of the day off and try it again tomorrow.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I often do this, but I always hit Ctrl-S before running it again. Shamefully, this probably works about 10% of the time. Does that technically count as changing nothing?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well, duh! You need to use the right incantations!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    Somehow higher than 0% success rate.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    it's only dumb til it works

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago*
    [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    Sponsored by QA gang. Gotta make sure it's a 5/5 issue and not just a frequent issue

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›