I was on the beta testing team and have been using Beeper for a little over two years now.

The convenience of having an application to house all of your chat networks is amazing.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 151 points 3 years ago (20 children)

While I agree that it would be nice to only have one app installed in order to chat with everyone, the fact that it’s not open source makes me question the privacy involved. I’ve already sold my soul to these individual chat apps. I’d rather not compound that problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 years ago* (13 children)

    The bridges are all open source, and they use matrix synapse as their server installation - though their client is a closed source fork of element with changes. You can use any matrix client to connect to it, and they say it's a standard synapse setup.

    If privacy is a concern, bringing your own client should remove that concern as the rest is open source. It's also e2e encrypted, as any matrix server is.

    I self host my own matrix homeserver with bridges set up using their code. The only bit of their stack I can't use is the client. I don't like that that's closed source, that's frustrating.

    Edit: while writing this two more people made the same comment. Sorry!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • [–] 78 points 3 years ago (25 children)

    My worry would be who is funding it and how they plan to keep operating. Venture Capital startups will always betray their users.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [+] 29 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    their clients are proprietary but it’s built on matrix (federated chat kinda like xmpp) and their bridges (things that connect matrix to other protocols) are open source

    they say you can use any matrix client, and that you can host your own home server with their bridges

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    I have my own matrix server that I primarily use like beeper and bridge all my chats together. Even using some of their bridges, it's been pretty reliable for years.

    I know that a few people are hating on the closed source client, but that feels unfair to me. They provide lots of open code in the form of bridges which is really the meat of the offering. Their client just makes using the bridges easier for the lay person. The bridges are super easy to use without it, invite the bridge bot to a chat room, type login and do what it says, then type login-matrix and your pretty much done.

    The I suspect that the same people who are displeased about the closed client also like using tailscale which is generally pretty popular but has closed source clients on Windows and Mac as well as the server (though all support the open source headscale server)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 58 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    This post reads like an ad, how is it upvoted so much?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I tried Beeper two weeks ago.

    Performance was not great and I didn’t like the apps design that much but most importantly: this is not what I want. I want chat apps to be interoperable. I don’t want to be on WhatsApp and Signal and Matrix and yadayadayada. I want to be only on Matrix in the future. I hope the EUs DMA makes that happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 years ago (15 children)

    There's reasons people moved away from multi-network apps like Trillian and Gaim/Pidgin... They were always playing catch-up with the official clients, and frequently broke when there were server-side changes. Protocols for proprietary messaging apps were (and still are) undocumented. I'm not convinced they've actually solved any of these issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

    If Beeper does become a successful business though, there'll be a full time development team "playing catch-up" with money behind them. It's interesting if you read this that they're rolling out features ahead of the message providers in some cases!

    They're also leveraging some existing infrastructure. Beeper is built on Matrix which does a lot of the heavy lifting for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

    Most of the protocols supported by Trillian were walled gardens too - AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, etc were all proprietary.

    I think they mostly died when GChat turned off XMPP support and became a walled garden.

    Trillian had paid full-time developers too. I'm not sure what'd they'd be doing differently to what Trillian did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    The last time I heard the word beeper it referred to a pager. You kids know what a pager was?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    The biggest question of all,- Is it Open source ?

    My phone will only installs opensource apps.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 21 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    think I'm gonna give this a try but the style of writing in the blog post isn't making this easy

    👩‍🚀 Spacebar

    Not the one on your keyboard, silly 😜

    shudders

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Ok but why is the thumbnail a scene from Midsommar…

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 years ago

    This looks like a promising application; and as long as the business models stay sustainable and the company remains ethical; it should be a good place.

    I'll bite and queue up.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    For… free… seems like people make a very strong effort to not learn a shit from experiences

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 years ago (16 children)

    Pidgin. That failed. Then we have matrix. That kinda failed. And now beeper?

    I don't know..

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    How did Matrix fail?

    It's the base for numerous messengers used by governments around the world, it has a userbase of more than 70 million core users (not counting the various closed messengers). Various competitors (e.g. Rocket Chat) have changed their base to Matrix.

    And Beeper is Matrix with Bridges (which you absolutely could deploy yourself). In theory anyone could recreate the Beeper functionality with existing other apps/bridges AND be able to communicate with Beeper on their native standard - Matrix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    This looks like a modern Trillian. It's about time.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children)

    I'm skeptical. Trillian still exists, but hardly anyone uses it. It can't connect to a bunch of services because their operators decided to disable third-party access, and I remember that even back in the day it was constantly playing catch-up with network updates that broke compatibility. "One chat app to rule them all" is a neat idea, but I don't see it working in practice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Would beeper give me access to iMessage without having an iDevice?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Sorry, I'll never use a service asking me upfront my phone number "for security purposes." Fuck off beeper!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    And the cost is simply your privacy and security

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Apparently it's based on matrix bridges, and you can self-host it if you want. Sounds intriguing imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago* (5 children)

    It’s not all bad, you’re right. It’s just that this

    To use Beeper, you must give the app permission to send and receive messages through other chat networks using your account credentials. By definition, this may be less secure than using other chat apps alone, especially encrypted chat apps like Signal.

    Makes me lose interest. I understand the motivation behind it, yes they encrypt e2e but it’s still sacrificing security (or maybe I should say increasing risk)

    Self hosting is a good alternative option!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Well universal chat (like universal e-mail) is either going to be a common open protocol (does not seem very likely given Apple and all the other players) or is going to be something like this on the client side. Although its a lot of work, it does seem more possible. The only pity is it can't solve connecting to services that I don't use like Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Anyone have any thoughts on the privacy and security aspect of this?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›