this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
86 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
6307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Would it be more palatable to their sensitive dispositions if we called it ethnic cleansing instead?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Americans are cool with genocide; you just have to call it "manifest destiny."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

It’s as American as Thanksgiving!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I suspect some clarification will come out that claims that there’s some reason it doesn’t count as genocide because of some narrow parsing of words. In other words, it’s only sparkling indiscriminate mass murder of a mostly homogeneous region, not genocide.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is a war crime, regardless...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

It's easy to miss war crimes when you're not looking........this is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

That's what I was wondering. Could they please release the full definition of the version of the word "genocide" they're using?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"They're happening, we're just choosing not to see them" ~ The State Department probably

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, Republicans are going ignore this and start impeachment proceedings on DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas due to border security issues instead.

I mean I don't want the Republicans to impeach anyone, but if you're going to impeach a cabinet-level position, impeach the one pretending a genocide isn't happening while we all watch it happen with our own eyes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

They could start at the top and work their way down

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

"Nah nah nah nah, I can't hear you," State Dept says.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago

It's easy to miss war crimes when you're not looking...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

You can’t see anything with your head in the sand.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is much easier to see when you actually open your eyes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

yes, 🙈 ...minus the smile.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The millions that our government officials receive in JStreet money every year is paying off for Israel

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

... in Wall Street ? (main USA trading place)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

No, AIPAC campaign contributions to politicians

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

"30 citizens die in Ukrian" ... Omg boycutt that war criminal putin!

"20000 citizens die in Gaza"... Please send billions worth of bombs to Netenyhu

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

The whole "genocide" talk is just so misguided. If Israel was trying to just kill as many Palestinians as they could, only a raving, idiotic lunatic would think the numbers would be anywhere even close to where they are.