Many people seem to have a favorable opinion of him, for supposedly defending the Roman republic during its collapse, but seeing his history and actions he did everything to defend the interests of the Roman elite to the detriment of the Roman population, and abused the system against their enemies when it was convenient and was a landowner famous for building the buildings in a horrible shape. Still, it has a reputation for having defenders to this day.

all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 2 years ago (5 children)

From parenti's book about Julius Caesar he sounds like his time's version of the bourgeois idealogue so I don't like him.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    yeah, IIRC he was a landlord and slave owner whose claims are still taken at face value by bourgeois historians

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That's what bothers me, they take his allegations as truth, without doubting their veracity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    It's not the veracity that has to be taken into account but rather the context. There are very little competing accounts from his time because historically persistent writing was a huge privilege back then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    cool guy i like his jester hat but i think his a bit weird talking to the night mother alone and all that, but i think we can have a great friendship since i know he would never betray me.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I'm with Engels on this one.

    other stuff about him

    Cicero abhorred revolutionaries as mentally unwell and deranged.

    Here his spinelessness displays proudly, as he argues for a mixed [political] economy: something that takes the best from all three forms of governance; kingship, aristocracy, and democracy.


    He's been the ruling class's guy from his first oration to millennia beyond his death. He bore nothing but contempt for the masses and sought whatever opportunities he could that would make his pathetic life more comfortable at their expense.

    Peoples' histories will eventually relegate him to the prestigious honor of having been the creator of one of the world's first gender neutral restrooms. 🪦🚻

    quotes from The Assassination of Julius Caesar by Michael Parenti

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago*

    Funnily enough, he was also an archetypical liberal, being homo novus in Roman establishment, he ceaslessly bootlicked guys who really despised him, but opposed those that respected him. His death was fitting when he insulted the wrong guy and none of his "esteemed colleagues" lifted a finger to defend him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago*

    I was listening to people reviewing the first season of HBO's Rome, and what stuck with me is they pointed out that post-2016, the Pompey/Anti-Caesar faction seems like the most out of touch geriatric Democrats. Even if they are in the abstract on the right side, they are so dedicated to the status quo and can't seem to understand that things have moved on, and people don't believe in the forms or institutions anymore. So they are stuck defending institutions from the right and complaining about how Trump/Caesar is not following the norms.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I didn't vote for him.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Cool guy, I met him in Miami once. No complaints here.

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)