all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 89 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We could have 13 months of 28 days. And we could make spring the beginning of the new year. You know, like nature? But noooo, some dumbass emperor wants extra days for “his” month like 2000 years ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 22 hours ago

    We could have 12 months of 3 tendays each with 5 extra intercalary holidays every year.

    Anyway, the Roman thing is a bit misunderstood. July and August weren't added. January and February were. It used to be that winter was just this cold mess of monthless time. July and August were simply renamed in honour of Julius and Augustus Caesar, previously being Quintilis and Sextilis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    wait till you hear about the 13th month that would've made every month the same length (28 days)

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

    I loved that concept, until someone reminded me that a lot of greedy people would take the opportunity to charge us 1 extra month for the stuff, and almost no one would properly recalculate things, while they would certainly recalculate our salaries

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Not every month. You still need to account for ~1 1/4 days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (5 children)

    The thirteen month calendar accounts for this. Every four years at the end of the year, you have a month that is 1 day long, and is simply called "New Year's Day".

    Personally I would hate this calendar because birthdays and holidays will always be on the same day of the week. Born on a Monday? Your birthday will always be on Monday for the rest of your life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Wait, that doesn't sound right. Wouldn't that mean that the start of the year and thus the first day moves 6h further every NYD? So days would start at midnight initially but at noon after 2 years? Or do you lose the alignment between months and days so months don't necessarily start at midnight, and after 4 years they start a day later?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    I suppose it was that fellow named Augustus

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago (9 children)
  • [–] 9 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Actually ☝️

    The Roman calendar used to have 10 months including a "Quintilis (July)" and "Sextilis (August)" long before Caesar. Obviously that means 5 (quint) and 6 (sex).

    When they introduced January and February to make 12 months, that's what misaligned the months, not July and August. Before Quintilis and Sextilis were renamed, their numbering was already off.

    Caesar didn't fix it when he remade the calendar, but he also isn't the one who caused the problem. The problem is that January is the first month when it should be (and used to be) March. If we just made March the first month, it would realign the other months so they make sense. And then leap days would be added to the final month of February, which just makes more sense than putting them in the second month.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    ...

    THAT WAS THE SAME GUY?!?!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Yes, 1000 years ago he invented oranges and salads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    I will upvote this every time

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)