Oof I think this service is only worth it if you have a family plan and everyone helping. That is how I personally make it reasonable in terms of pricing.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 56 points 3 years ago (10 children)

I’m in the UK and it’s already too expensive imo.

Would be great if I could just pay for no ads YT without YT music.

In fairness, the amount of YT that I watch on TV/iPhone makes it worth the cost, but any increases and I’ll probably just cancel and watch less YT, which isn’t a bad thing.

Or maybe just look at getting one of those Turkish subscriptions for like £2/month

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Wow! It was hardly worth it to begin with.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I can somewhat understand Hulu and Netflix raising prices because of video content licensing but Youtube Premium? Fucking stupid as hell.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Youtube Vanced on my devices, Piped on my computers. gg saved you 13.99 a month

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    NewPipe is also a good alternative if you want to cut Google off your data, it doesn't use accounts and instead subscriptions are kept locally on the device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    I don't comment at all, so NewPipe gets most of the functionaloty I would ever want from YouTube. Plus, it also helps by not having personalized reccomendations to keep me stuck watching it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    I use yt-dlp to pull down YouTube videos, and have ad blockers on my web browser (I didn't actually realize that YouTube even had ads until what was apparently years until after they'd rolled out, was stunned when I used someone else's computer).

    However, I would assume that if a significant chunk of people go that way and YouTube decides that they're losing out on sufficient ad revenue and/or profiling data doing this, that they're going to start blocking those. I would guess that they can make life unworkably difficult for any third-party clients connecting to their service if they put their minds to it.

    YouTube probably doesn't care about SponsorBlock, because they aren't getting a piece of that money. Heck, they probably benefit if it encourages advertisers to go through YouTube rather than content creators on YouTube. But the profiling and the YouTube-displayed ads are probably something that they are going to care about, if push comes to shove and the impact on their bottom line is large enough.

    And one more point -- I can believe that the Threadiverse could potentially displace Reddit. Usenet was distributed and was once the norm for Internet forums, and something like that could be the situation again.

    But the bandwidth costs of videos are a lot higher than the bandwidth costs of forum text. I am not convinced that PeerTube or something like that will necessarily work at the scale of replacing YouTube. At the least, it's going to be a rather larger chunk of money that has to come from somewhere than is the situation with forums. Someone is going to have to be writing checks, at the end of the day. Maybe it doesn't have to be via watching ads or users getting profiled, but the money's gotta be coming out of someone's pocket.

    YouTube also has some of its content creators putting material up to be paid. Reddit doesn't -- well, didn't, as it looks like now they're exploring that -- have that commercial model, where they try to pay people who create content. For YouTube content where the creator is doing it with the aim of generating income, any hypothetical YouTube replacement would need to generate money to cover not just bandwidth costs, but also paying content creators.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Yeah, there's no reason to pay for Premium unless you have an iPhone (and hopefully even that will change once the EU drags Apple kicking and screaming away from their App Store monopoly.)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Gripping tight onto my initial grandfathered price from Google play music. $8

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 19 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Objectively, Youtube Premium is the one streaming service that I actually use... with youtube dlp because actually I can't stand the interface at all anymore; but even so, I use it and I feel ok about paying for it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Nebula has a lot of the better YT content and costs much less than that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I've been sailing the last few years so far out, I can't see the land anymore. And kinda don't care about land anymore...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (19 children)

    What is the point of Youtube Premium anyway?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    It means the creators I enjoy actually get paid, whereas with adblock they don't get any ad revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    The creators will see jack shit of that price increase. It's all going into exec's pockets. The smart ones all have Patreon or other ways of monetising their content anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    You may be surprised to hear that the revenue split on Premium is the same as the split on Ads: 55% of all Premium money goes directly to creators on a member viewership basis. Alphabet increasing the price of Premium does increase the money going to Youtube corporate, but the revenue structure is fundamentally designed so that creators also receive an equal raise.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    Block ads without having to use an AdBlocker, but like who doesn’t use an AdBlocker these days

    On mobile it allows you to continue playing videos when you close the app

    And a recent addition they’ve added to it for mobile is the ability to fucking queue videos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    but like who doesn’t use an AdBlocker these days

    Hard to do from a game console or Chromecast, which happen to be the two methods I use most often for watching YouTube.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    If you got an apple device safari is fantastic when it comes to just air playing YouTube videos without ads. Sponsorblock extension works too and skips them. No messing around with third party apps installs.

    Although, I'm not sure if consoles or chrome cast have airplay support.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Phones, tablets; Revanced Extended

    Android TV; Smarttubenext

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    I use smartTube ony my TV (with sponsorblock integrated), LibreTube and newPipe on my phone (no ads, and download included), and YouTube + adguard, sponsorblock, unhook, dislike button extensions on my Desktoo. With all that effort, i do not need paying for Youtube premium.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    youtube-dlp is the solution!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago

    Huh? The ad revenue it replaces can't be more than $1/month.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Definitely wasn't worth it before and now they want to increase prices? Yikes. Guess I'll keep using revanced forever then

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    The annual subscription, which was introduced in January of 2022, goes to $139.99 in a $20 increase.

    I literally renewed just two days ago, right under the wire!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›