top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 16 minutes ago

The non-negative commenters forgot to /s.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 hours ago

    Good thing the wealthy elite ignores what 99% of people say.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 5 hours ago

    greedy psychos have really turned AI data centers into the dark satanic mills

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 hours ago

    There is a sampling bias in that.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

    Watch how this makes no difference in how many get built in the next fiscal year.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

    I really don't think so at this point. Banks don't want to invest. Hardware is being gate kept or simply isn't available. It's like going to track day and burning up your tires. You then have spam altman crying about ram because he's been told about the logistics. Then don't be surprised when microslop will use your computer passively--it will likely happen. Then the funniest part is there's not enough c-sec people. I don't even want to pursue a career in it and the line has shrunk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 53 minutes ago

    Then don’t be surprised when microslop will use your computer passively–it will likely happen.

    We need a Free Software cooperative peer-to-peer thing to do that first.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    Agree with all your points but none of those reasons are we supposedly live in a democracy and the vast majority of us don't want these data centres.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago

    Solid response. Most people know what they're really being used for now. Like I don't think I want drones flying around scanning plates or otherwise. I don't want to share the water or power bills with this crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 8 hours ago (24 children)

    What sucks is there will be a day when we actually want more data centers - you know, in a responsible way that is respectful to the people - and we will still have a bad taste in our mouths and will not trust it.

    Thanks tech bro capitalists, you ruin everything you touch.

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    I’d really like libraries to get into the data center business. Not for profit but simply to serve the needs of their customers:

    • Providing some way to store a small amount of data.
    • Small businesses could use reasonably priced compute for their needs.

    It really comes down to who is running the center and for what reason. We don’t want to invest in AI data centers. But I think the people would support library data centers where price gouging isn’t the incentive for its creation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 8 hours ago (16 children)

    The amount of data center the average person needs can fit in a shoebox. Everyone can just run a little server in their closet or whatever. We don’t need gigantic warehouses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago*

    I think you've vastly underestimated how much digital media people consume...

    But setting that aside, there are real efficiency wins from scale. I am a self-hoster, I have a fleet of machines I manage with Nix, I run local LLMs and do real work on consumer gaming hardware, i'm a huge fan of federated and distributed peer systems. I am 100% for that. The cloud is just somebody else's computer. And I'm saying we also need the gigantic warehouses. Absolutely.

    The issue is zoning and environmental concerns and the effect on communities and strain on public infrastructure. All issues worsened by the AI boom and incentivized by capitalism.

    There's a way to do datacenters right and its been done before. You just need legislation and enforcement. The problem isn't datacenters: the problem is that the same people putting up datacenters are the same people who own your politicians

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago

    Everyone hosting their services on their own hardware is the web infrastructure equivalent of getting everyone to smelt pig iron in their backyards. Some amount of datacentres are necessary for the functioning of a modern internet.
    The problems we're seeing at the moment are a result of artificially inflated demand driven by AI bullshit disrupting supply lines of hardware that could actually be useful to people, the lack of environmental planning, and the condescending refusal by datacentre builders to engage with the reasons communities are opposed to their projects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 6 hours ago* (3 children)

    Also, I want most of the services they want to move to the cloud to still work when the net is down.

    I may want to use a computer to watch my media library or play a game that I already own with out an active internet connection and ID card. Or, just use a word processor or tax program, or image editor.

    Sorry, please provide your ID to log in to the cloud to do basic daily tasks, citizens. This is for your own good, trust us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

    A couple weeks ago my internet went out and it was great that my Plex server still worked on my local network.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 hours ago

    We were out after the hurricane last month and it wasn't until two weeks later that I realized we could have all been watching movies off my generator. 🙄 Oh well. I did have 5 houses running refrigerators and chargers off that crappy genny, so there's that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago

    It's been a heavy rainy season here, lots of wind, power and net issues.

    Meanwhile, the LAN works on a UPS, solar, and no Internet.

    (Sure is nice being able to put on a movie or music playlist, and work on documents, or sort though old vacationphotos when it's a rainy day with out a cloud failure blocking it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    We already did that and the early internet was wildly power inefficient and unreliable. I'd rather have a million websites in one DC than a million server closets splattered all over the planet.

    This post brought to you by this DC:

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    Everyone can just run a little server in their closet or whatever.

    I'm not trusting the average person to not let it turn into a botnet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago

    Been talking about AI backlash causing friendly fire. Over on Bluesky, people were enraged about a new DC going up because they assumed it was an AI hyperscalar. Nope, it was the size of a large Walmart, in an industrial park outside of town, with a large water supply available. The owners are the state university and Sandia National Laboratories, not tech bros, and they listed some laudable (to me anyway) research goals.

    Even with a handful of us explaining the situation:

    "I don't CARE! We don't need no GOT DAMNED DATA CENTERS!"

    "Including the one that sent me your message? AWS-US-EAST-2 needs to go?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 hours ago

    Yeah, regular data centres have existed for a while and don't come with a fraction of the drawbacks that come with AI data centres

    Amazon and Google's cloud businesses are probably loving this because it soft locks out any new future competitor to that business

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago

    Ngl, this means nothing. People that hate data centers talk more about it online than people that don't hate them.

    If you were to ask people in a proportionally chosen group whether they are against data centers, the result would be pretty different I presume.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 8 hours ago
    [+] 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago

    If only those dirty peasants didn't buy up so much RAM for their personal computers. These poor, struggling data centers need more tax breaks so they can compete.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago

    Unfortunately it's slightly less negative about the AI ponzi scheme in general.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

    They got greedy - bought everything, from memory, electrical equipment, to whole governments, in search of money, forever soiling an emerging new tech with the need for greed

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 hours ago* (2 children)

    Honestly LLMs never provided any value in the first place, it degrades everything it touches. Even if it costed $0 it's still a misinformation machine trying and failing to replace laborers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›