What would Pentti Linkola say about this I wonder :)
post
Honestly go after the contractors that did the clearing too. They should know that this kind of thing requires permits and google clearly didnt show them any proof of those.
They need to be declined use of the site and forced to pay for revegetation.
Surely to God foreigners (especially foreign corporations) can't just come and do that shit in a country. There must have been some signoff by the local authorities, otherwise isn't that an invasion?
Judging from the content of the article, the problem is that Google's local subsidiary started on construction prematurely before the environmental assessment paperwork was complete (but after they already owned the site). Short of keeping a watch on the site 24/7, I don't see how the local authorities could have prevented that. It's possible that they may have been lazy and complacent, but absent actual evidence I doubt they were complicit.
Our society operates to a large extent on an underlying assumption that most people will not try to do anything blatantly illegal in plain view. Finland has just learned the hard way that this is not true of large American corporations.
most people will not try to do anything blatantly illegal in plain view
And, as Microsoft's guy said last year, these motherfuckers think they have "social consent" (God I fucking hate that term) to do anything that isn't explicitly illegal under the letter of the law.
No, it isn't an invasion. Google bought and owned this land, then started construction before getting the permits to do so.
This is like you buying a small vacation land by a lake in another country, then starting to build a cabin on it before getting permits to build. You aren't invading that country.
all 19 comments