I couldn't agree more. And I don't think I'm being hateful here, I just honestly believe that monsters like that should get locked up for good. If they prove that they're a danger to other people (in this case, young, innocent women) and society by doing something so heinous, they should get jail for life, not writing essays...
Can we all agree on this?

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 3 hours ago

Well on the one hand if you have an official judgement it should not be reduced just because this will negatively impact the perpetrators life. On the other hand we always need a way to resocialise perpetrators or they will just don't care when they get out of jail. Further we life in a world where judgements are used against minorities or as a political weapon.

The judical system in the US is fucked.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago

    We aren't ruining their future; they are.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago

    They ruined their own lives. They had a choice.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    Hot take, this should not even have to be a question posed. This should be the default and there's nothing you can say to convince me that a person doesn't deserve the full brunt of the law being thrown down on them for these heinous acts. I don't care who it is, how much money they have, or what position in government they hold.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 9 hours ago

    If these were 25 year old black dudes at a house party the president would be lining up the televised firing squad.

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    I like to characterize this as a direct consequence of their own bad decisions, and not something other people are doing to them. They chose to be shit and it only works out for them as long as other shits are there to protect them. Take away that privilege and they whine that they're being victimized when the consequences are no longer deferred.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

    Hear hear!

    Reporting to the police does not guarantee justice.

    FBI crime data shows that law enforcement clears 26% of reported rape cases. In this data, “cleared” may mean someone was arrested or even that the suspect was deceased; it does not necessarily mean the perpetrator was charged, convicted, incarcerated, or otherwise held accountable.

    The clearance rate directs our attention to the 74% of survivors of rape whose cases remain unresolved every year. That’s at least 125,274 people who reached out for justice they may never receive.

    4 in 5 reported perpetrators are never charged with a crime.

    For many survivors, reporting sexual violence means entering a system where the outcome is uncertain. A report may be investigated, cleared, closed, declined, or moved forward—but only a fraction of reported cases lead to criminal charges.

    A 20-year review of sexual assault case outcomes found that just under 20% of reported rape and sexual assault cases are criminally charged.

    This number points to one reality: many survivors report sexual violence without seeing the person who harmed them formally charged with a crime.

    Being believed by police does not ensure accountability.

    A 20-year review of reported rape and sexual assault cases found that 89% were “founded” by law enforcement, meaning police determined that the crime more than likely occurred.

    But only 8% of reported rape and sexual assault cases ended in conviction.

    In other words, police believed most reports, but very few cases led to the perpetrator’s conviction. Survivors can be believed and still not get the legal outcome they seek.

    Justice requires more than recognizing harm. It requires systems prepared to move cases forward and support survivors through what comes next.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

    Holy shit...
    Thanks for the data girlie, but also that is depressing...and scary. I honestly don't know what I'd do if that happened to me. This country's judicial system is known for giving people who rape CHILDREN, MULTIPLE TIMES just simply...probation. And it makes my fucking blood boil, cause I know I wouldn't get justice. Never mind me, the real victims don't. And that disgusts me...
    Thanks Velma 💜

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    It is depressing, I know and I'm sorry :/

    I do strongly believe that more knowledge, more discussion, more visibility will help bring these numbers down. More outrage. More calling out rape culture. More of us saying "What the Actual Fuck" each time a rapist is protected by those in power.

    We have strength together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 11 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

    Based? I would hope that this is the default for most people 😭

    But I know better, of course, coming from a country that used to treat weed possession (now legal) much more harshly than people literally raping multiple CHILDREN for YEARS (they usually get probation for that for fuck's sake...), so much so that it literally became a dark, fucked up meme among Czechs
    I hate this place 😔

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    There are some "mistakes" that simply disqualify a person from living a normal life. When it permanently traumatizes someone, that mistake should follow the person who made it for the rest of their life.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

    I agree on everything except the not being hateful part. Not about you, but about how I feel about it and what I would personally do to them if I was allowed to. I'm not afraid of committing evil.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    I still dislike committing (violent) evil against evil people. Call me naive, but it just doesn't sit right with me...
    What I would do tho is prescribe every single one of these fucking rapists high-dose cyproterone acetate, which is a strong blocker that annihilates testosterone.

    Speaking from personal experience (feminizing HRT), it destroys your libido and without estradiol to replace that T-driven libido, they'd be practically asexual. It's called chemical castration and it's extremely effective.
    And btw, I really mean that CPA destroys your libido, in those first few months before the E libido kicks in, you don't even want to think about sex. And of course, they wouldn't have the E to get their libidos back.

    I mean, they had their chances with libido. They had their sexual urges and they proved that they used those to commit heinous acts, so imo they shouldn't have those urges anymore.

    I know this is particularly cruel, because the human body needs a dominant sex hormone. And I'm not suggesting to forcefully transition them and make the grow boobs against their will, I'm just saying to rid them of the ability to do this to other people.

    This honestly came out much more fucked up than I expected, but I'll post the comment anyway, because chemical castration is an effective way of dealing with sex offenders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    Personally, I think that chemical castration isn't enough. I support full castration of repeat offenders. When you harm someone like that, you should not have the right to do it again, consensual or not. It should no longer be an option. You've forfeited your right to sex by violating the sacred model of consent. You should not be allowed to raise children to do the things you did to women.

    But of course, that's merely a fantasy. Society (men, for the most part) will likely never be convinced that sexual assault is heinous enough to deserve that punishment in my lifetime. I can only hope that changes in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • chemical castration is interesting because I know some people who are punished with it for some sexual offenses and they haven't become asexual. I would support castration as a punishment if it actually helped, but in my experience of their bodies it just changes the gender expression (including some of the body sexual characteristics) without having that much effect on libido.

    Maybe the effects of the drug as a punishment are poorly studied if the subject is inclined to misrepresent changes in libido to authorities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago*

    Hating evil people is not evil. It is morally correct.

    Pacifists are the true culprits of our current predicament. They are the ones who made excuses for evil and allowed it to fester in every nook and cranny of society without consequence, all based on the asinine assumption that we are all essentially the same, that deep inside we all have souls. It could not be further from the truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 12 hours ago* (1 child)

    Yes. Or at least I hope so. Presumably there are no criminal judges here as they seem to be the most inclined to the opposing viewpoint.

    It is insane to me that this gets hauled out as a reason for light sentencing over and over again. Having an impact on a person's life is literally the point, and here they are openly sidestepping it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    these people have no problems ruining the futures of countless women and girls. the very least they deserve is the legal and social consequences of their actions.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 11 hours ago* (3 children)

    Surprising no woman: Men are more likely to say they trust how officials handle sexual assault

    The survey, which was first shared exclusively with The 19th, found that women are 14 percentage points more likely than men to say they think elected officials have done too little to prevent sexual assault. Women are also 13 percentage points more likely than men to say they think college sororities and fraternities hurt campus culture, and 10 percentage points more likely to say they don’t trust sororities or frats to respond appropriately to claims of sexual assault.

    Happened to stumble on this and it's incredibly on topic with the comments I've been fielding today on this topic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    This...doesn't give me hope at all...
    Still, it's important to talk about. Thanks Velma 💜

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Buried at the end of the article is a badass woman who is refusing to be silent to put a little pep back in your step:

    Hunt said she is also frustrated by the silence from men.

    “It should not be women’s job to tell you that you have to be pissed,” Hunt said. “You need to hold each other accountable. You need to call out your friends. And when a story like this comes out, you should be some of the first to speak up and say, ‘This is not alright.’ It’s not on your mother, your wife, your girlfriend or your daughter to bring it to your attention.”

    “I challenge every man to do that.”

    Hunt was involved in the ousting of former Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, who was accused of sexual assault, and former Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, who resigned from Congress after he was accused of rape and sexual misconduct. Both men are Democrats.

    Women are not likely to go silent on this issue soon. Social media and in-person protests on campuses and near seats of power continue to be peppered with women proclaiming that they, too, were assaulted. They, too, are Jane Doe.

    “Women are done accepting predators in power, and we are fighting back with every lever available to us,” Hunt said. “We are making sure that violence against women is not just a liability but a dealbreaker for those looking to hold elected office, and this will be a motivating issue in the November midterms.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment