all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 2 days ago*

They claim GPL 3 license but the whole thing was written by a chat bot, so can they even pretend they own it instead Anthropic? I'd be interested to see how that would play out if challenged.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Something wrong with logseq?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    have been waiting for something like this. Does it support plug-ins or accept contributions?

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Ok, so slopscore is basically worthless (because the author decided to just put that paragraph in instead of doing what your supposed to do and have the slop machine as a co-author or whatever it is?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    I don't know why it's worthless but it clearly did not catch the fact that the author says it's made almost exclusively using AI. Seems kind of worthless if it didn't register any AI when the author hasn't even tried to hide it and even states it in public

  • source
  • parent