I think we are looking on the wrong angle. We are so focused on the AI usage that we completely ignored part that can bite us hard in the back in the future. This is me trying to untangle this point.

All feedback is welcomed.

From my view, all software is political in some sense. And if a software claims that isn't political is a political statement in itself. And with the recent dubious statement from Linus in the Kernel of Linux. I think we should either think about it or discuss about it.

What is the political intention that is happening in this.

All feedback is welcomed.

In my view, all software is political in one way or another. Also, when software makes an attempt to be "politically neutral", in doing so it is making a political point.

So let's pick the Linus questionable part regarding the not a Social Warrior place, and I feel that it is time to either think about it or talk about it.

All feedback is welcomed.

I think that all software has a certain amount of politics in it and to say that software is non political.. is in itself a political statement.

With the mailchain of Linus... (with lack of better word) questionable quote in the Linux kernel, I think it would be good for us to discuss this issue. What are the politics behind this?

All feedback is welcomed.