"We already have daylight saving where we change by an hour and no one gets bothered about that,"
What the fuck. EVERYONE gets bothered about that!
I can actually get behind this leap hour idea, but holy crap that is a bad way to present it
"We already have daylight saving where we change by an hour and no one gets bothered about that,"
What the fuck. EVERYONE gets bothered about that!
I can actually get behind this leap hour idea, but holy crap that is a bad way to present it
I know this is intended to help, but as a software Dev who does work where absolute time between two arbitrary clock times does need to resolve to the second... This is that xkcd comic about a 14th standard.
This was a vote to basically say "the future will deal with it".
An hour is a long time! This means that, in an area that observes DST, they could be off by 2 hours. Not to mention China's one timezone situation.
I feel like a leap minute would've been more reasonable to deal with. Unless they're just betting on humans not needing computers (or, uh...time tracking) by the time a leap hour would be relevant
all 7 comments