64
"This non-profit will be the 'voice of the gamers'" - Former Disco Elysium devs break new ground with player- and developer-owned studio structure, and you can get involved right now (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 17 hours ago by to c/games@hexbear.net
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 9 hours ago

scared

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 18 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    voice of the gamer

    threatful

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 24 points 15 hours ago (12 children)

    damn it's like a shittier version of a multi-stakeholder coop

    since coop isn't anywhere in there, but there's a lot of coop language, my conclusion is grift. which, couldn't happen to a more oppressed class, gamer-gulag

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 14 hours ago (11 children)

    The word "co-op" is used on their own site.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

    For all those workers who are not part of the creative co-op of full-time workers, a second co-op is being designed

    this is very naive and not a cooperative. a coop is one member, one vote. you can still give disproportionate ownership to different stakeholders in a multi-stakeholder coop.

    that they call this multiple coops, and that they call the consumer-ownership a "non-profit", I think this is still clearly a grift. I hope they put out a good game, I'll probably play it. but I'm not going to buy in

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

    What exactly are you looking for here? I don't feel like involving players any more than they already are in this setup would be a good idea, knowing the average gamer. Wouldn't imagine this game will sell enough copies for profit sharing to hand out anything significant either.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 9 hours ago* (5 children)

    Wouldn't imagine this game will sell enough copies for profit sharing to hand out anything significant either.

    If they make a good game despite their weird organizational structure, why not? DE had on the order of magnitude of 100 of millions of dollars in sales. Even fraction of that could translate into a pretty healthy bonus pay at least.

    I see people asking for a spiritual successor of DE all the time, so the game probably doesn't even have to be all that great to be successful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    DE had on the order of magnitude of 100 of millions of dollars in sales.

    Sure, but it also had millions of players. It'd end up paying out like one of those class action settlements where everyone gets like $12. I would hope the actual developers have some kind of profit sharing going on, though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    Honestly, all they have to do is get the voice actor for the internal voices, and I would buy anything they release.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 40 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

    Every gamer a member of the board

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 36 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    evrart

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 35 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Of course Gamer voices will be heard, Harry. Do you honestly think I would co-opt Union jargon for an elaborate scheme?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •