Rep. Delia Ramirez is expected to introduce a bill to abolish the Department of Homeland Security and eliminate all immigrant detention in the United States on Tuesday, the Illinois Democrat shared exclusively with The Intercept.

The Reimagining Safety Act would repeal “duplicative and overreaching terrorism laws,” according to the bill summary and text, and curtail the widespread surveillance state that emerged in the wake of 9/11 terror attacks.

It comes the day after agents from Homeland Security Investigations searched the home of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., in what the Department of Justice has described as an opaque “federal criminal investigation.” HSI is a component of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, the agency at the center of mounting concerns about the violent weaponization of DHS against immigrants and the Trump administration’s perceived political enemies.

The sweeping legislation faces long odds in Congress, but Ramirez argues that strictly limiting the government’s immigration enforcement apparatus is critical for public safety in the wake of yet another shooting by federal immigration agents.

...

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 hour ago

Realistically what does the dhs even do? Wouldn’t it be more efficient to abolish them and give their authority and funding to the states?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    The people who will fight this the hardest will be the long toothed democrats unfortunately

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago

    The whole position and power of the DHS needs to be reviewed and reworked. In most other countries, this is handled by the equivalent Department of the Interior. The department doesn't need to have it's own unchecked military force to get the job done.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    DHS formed in the wake of 9/11 because federal agencies could not get their shit together and collaborate. Whether by design or rapid evolution, it became less of a coordinating agency between disparate federal intelligence agencies and more of a mysterious extra-judicial entity with a military arm. Oh and TSA. Let's not forget about humble ole' TSA.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago

    It does make sense to have someone who coordinates all the different federal police and intelligence forces in the country. The US has TSA, ATF, FBI, CIA, NSA, DEA, Secret Service, Federal Marshals, even the USPS has a police force.

    Without some kind of coordination you have undercover agents of one service being wiretapped and followed by another service. Plus, you get the kinds of things that happened around 9/11 where each agency had a slice of the picture but they weren't sharing info so nobody had the whole picture.

    I think in a sensible country ATF would be the alcohol branch, tobacco branch and firearms branches of the federal police force. DEA would be the drug enforcement arm of that federal police force. It seems really strange to me that the FBI is basically the federal police force, but for some reason when it comes to firearms-related crime, that's someone else's department.

    Also, in a sensible country, someone would be policing the police. I don't actually think any country has properly figured that out though. In reality, it seems like an important role for the police is to enforce the status quo, and ensure that the people on top remain on top and the people on the bottom remain there. That allows police to place themselves slightly below the people on top, but importantly significantly above those on the bottom. Because of that, I don't think the rich and powerful in any country really want a fully controlled police force, otherwise they can't do the extra-judicial things that maintain the hierarchy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    This is your reminder that KGB meant (in Russian) basically the same thing as Department of Homeland Security.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Hands off the deep state lady

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

    At this point, it's going to be neigh on impossible to do away with the DHS. Few have any idea of just how much stuff has been crammed into that department. Everything from law enforcement down to FEMA and even the fire trucks and boots your local fire department use.

    That monster is huge.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Huh, almost like that was the point -- make it so sprawling people can't comprehend getting rid of it. Too bad a lot of us remember a world before the DHS, and it wasn't rampant street terrorism in the USA like they'd have you believe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 hours ago

    I do too. And I'm far older than most people here.

    I have had to deal with the byzantine bureaucracy we had before and the mess we have now. As I said, killing DHS would be a difficult thing because of the short sighted politicians and the short sighted electorate. Y'all got what you wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    Many of us remember the creation of DHS and we said then, and many experts also said then, that the department was going to be bad for Americans. In fact, it has been just as bad as we expected.

    Does anyone actually feel safe because of TSA compared with previous airport security? I sure don't. We certainly got safety by having locked reinforced cockpit cabins. But the agents who are doing the scanners, they miss weapons all the time. And of course they don't get paid well so if they wanted to smuggle weapons in I'm sure they could do so easily enough.

    And that's before we started talking about ICE.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Honestly, I'm more scared of TSA than anything they are supposedly preventing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    They do prevent a lot water bottles and belt buckles that would otherwise be a serious threat to the safety of good law-abiding citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 hours ago

    Of course the federal criminal investigation is opaque. They all are; if they were transparent, everyone involved would flee justice and destroy evidence. Ramirez is a rep and should know better.

    Anyway, I'm all for the deconstruction of our layers of police state, this is something that progressive dems and classic conservatives can agree on (and everybody in between).

    I like police, I'm just not into multiple different agencies doing the same work. It's redundant and it costs billions, we don't need US Border Patrol, ICE, and Department of Homeland Security. Just local and FBI is sufficient.

    However, Omar is a thief, and she should be investigated thoroughly, she stinks of corruption and rot. She had no money in 2018 when she was elected, now 8 years later she's a multi-millionaire. She's knee deep in welfare fraud, with her friends already serving decades behind bars for stealing tens of millions of dollars from the welfare system.

    She's stealing from the most vulnerable of people, the very people that she should be helping.

    ... and when Democrats take the majority in a couple weeks, they should also root out and arrest every corrupt Republican that they can (instead of sitting on their ass like they did when Biden was in office). I'm fine with bOtH pArTiEs investigating the other. More of this.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    The duplicative nature of DHS isn’t incompetence, it’s deliberate deception. DHS was created to put down dissidents in America, not terrorists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 18 hours ago

    I see your dhs and raise you the police.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 22 hours ago

    Yep, start rolling back all those patriot act police state bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 19 hours ago

    💯

    It was created in my lifetime and it totally fucking sucks. If we have to cut things because of budgetary concerns, it's a great candidate.

  • source
  • [–] 75 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    A lot of us remember an America without it and the DHS. They are both 9/11 knee jerk reactions that have been nothing but bad for us, exactly like the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions. We would have been so much better off to just take the (L) after 9/11 but W kept trying for a (W).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    DHS has always been a dystopian reminder of the ruination of America that began with the response to 9/11. I never agreed to give up any freedom for their security theater. They just did all that shit to us.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 85 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    Abolish the police state, don't stop at DHS.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Gotta slowly reverse boil the frog - these are definitely great first steps and will hopefully warm the public up to demilitarizing, then defanging, then defunding/abolishing the police state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    No party is more progressive than Democrats when they know their bills have absolutely no hope in hell of passing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago*

    I also advocate for incrementalism, but I do think that very progressive positions need to be staked out and anchored by certain members in Congress, to move the Overton window allowing more moderate Democrats to 'make compromises' and still land everyone in a better position.

    For DHS/ICE, if Congress can't herd enough cats to abolish them, they can hamstring anything they are permitted to do without a judge-signed warrant. They can also first cut the slush fund appropriated in 2025. If neither of those things work, they can change the purpose of DHS/ICE to go after employers who abuse undocumented workers or leverage restrictive visas against them, and help immigrants get visas instead of locking up and torturing them.

    It's easier to settle on the three improvement positions if the initial anchor is closer to the extreme.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    It's crazy how many people think we've always had DHS...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Go further abort Capitalism

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 18 hours ago

    In theory, a cabinet-level department can be removed with a bill that says "this entity is no longer a thing". But capitalism isn't an entity... You can't really remove it so much as you set up entirely new policies that would replace it. And that is a much different ball of wax to figure out

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 22 hours ago*

    Abolish the Republican party. Abolish corporate entities. Abolish private ownership of powerful technology. Abolish secret science in the form of private research. Everyone needs to know what you're doing with the worlds resources and whether it's a threat to the community. Eliminating the privacy of the powerful is the only surveillance system that is actually needed, for the safety of the community.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›