all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 42 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

He was clearly stating U.S. cities would have been threatened if a nuclear Iran hadn’t been stopped.

He clearly was not. But by all means, invite him to clarify. Stop speaking for him.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    I've heard a lot of people saying that, but these people fail to realize that he said it in front of cameras. We have the quote, I've gone over it dozens of times and I can't get any meaning out of it besides "Iran can blow up San Diego and Los Angeles and I wouldn't care."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 53 minutes ago

    I mean if you wanted to give a charitable interpretation it could be simply that there would be swift retribution and they would regret it. Like "oh I wish you would punch me" or something. So, yeah, let him clarify, but he simply won't, because that's not what he meant.

    Honestly Trump has a lot in common with The Bible in that he and God both speak a bunch of fucking word salad gibberish and we're all left alone to try to interpret WTF he just said because he refuses to clarify.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

    French here. Flabbergasted at the fact he and his goons have not been impeached/choppity-chopped yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Flabbergasted? Why?

    America is a spineless and complacent country full of ineffective limp-dick, do-nothing cowards that are happy to keep status quo if it means they don’t have to exert any effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    Today I saw Jamie Raskin lamenting that Trump has damaged US alliances globally. While, sure, Trump has been bad, voting in a Democrat isn't going to restore everything. The American public can always vote in another dangerous demagogue and I think the world has realised that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

    Let them hit Mar-a-Lardo?

    I think Dump is banking on more Americans having insane rightwing California Derangement Syndrome and I don't think most Americans really have that, just the weird freaks that adore people like him.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

    1 out of 8 people in us live in California. That’s 12.5% of the population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    And they get 2 senators, same as the 0.172% of Americans living in Wyoming. The US needs constitutional reforms in so many ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    This is not a problem. The Senate is half of one branch of government, and it's fine to give land limited say. It helps prevent us from turning the less populated states into dumping grounds.

    Even if you disagree, there are much bigger issues. Gerrymandering and Citizens United both do infinitely more damage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago

    It helps prevent us from turning the less populated states into dumping grounds.

    You’re going to have to prove that’s what would happen.

    You’re also going to have to explain why that’s worse than underfunding and not meeting the everyday needs of actual people- the vast majority of whom do not live in rural America- to prevent rural America from “Becoming a dumping ground”.

    (Also while you’re at it, show how republicans aren’t already turning rural America into liter all dumping grounds with their regulatory rollbacks.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Maybe this that surprise that he says they have planned. He going create flase flag in both cities and blame Iran and use it to cancel the elections.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 4 hours ago

    I suspect he's just itching to use nuclear weapons to be strong and stable and genius, being too stupid to understand why it's is a bad idea.

    The rest of his executive are also bloodthirsty fascists and probably don't actually have a problem sacrificing some "libs" or "commies" or whatever for their greater good apocalypic religious ravings.

  • source
  • parent