top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

AI is obviously a bubble.

That said, Burry has also predicted 6 of the last 2 crashes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

    The AI bubble will "burst" as soon as they figure out how to inflict all the damage onto regular working people. The housing bubble bursting is what enabled the ownership class to kick a bunch of working people out of their homes and then buy up all the recently vacated real estate for cheap. Nothing about the damage that the rich did to our economy caused any of them to face any actual consequences.

    The promise of AI was that it would replace all the workers, but it's not doing that fast enough and it's beginning to look like it never will. We've been hearing that the AI bubble will "burst any day now" for years at this point, but if it happened right now, the ownership class are the ones who would be left holding the bag, and that can't be allowed to happen. When they find a way to take it out of our hides, we'll see that suddenly the "invisible hand of the free market" will present a scenario such that the floodgates open and the bloodbath is finally allowed to proceed. I imagine that's why they started wrapping up so many pension funds and the like in AI investments.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago

    They already have. Public Banks are huge investors in the private credit companies that underpin a good amount of the AI bubble.

    The Magnificent 7 have been driving the stock markets gains for the last few years. They have also created independent companies to build out the data centers. The debt for these companies is off their books and funded primarily by private credit markets and is underpinned by contracts with the big 7 for data processing once the data center is built.

    Projections by the Mag 7 have driven their share increase. So what happens if one or two of the magnificent 7 miss their projections? Well look at Oracle, its stock is tanking because it missed projections.

    If the Mag. 7 stock tanks so will your 401ks. When their stock is worth less they will stop plowing money into AI. Suddenly all of the companies with contracts to build the data centers will loose their source of revenue. No revenue and they can’t pay off the loans to private credit. Private credit companies will start to go under and begin to take down the public banking companies that invested in them…

    Its a house of cards ready to fall if any of the Mag 7 start to flounder.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago*

    ownership class

    pension funds

    Same thing. Pension funds ARE the ownership class.

    I've been commenting that people over 55 own 52% of the US and baby boomers as a generation own ~8x more than billionaires as a class, but I re-checked and I'd quoted the wrong number in a bunch of my comments. 52% is for baby boomers only. All over 55s added together are actually over 70%. Let that sink in.

    The entire goal of the economy is to let old people enjoy the spoils of the young's work. Even billionaires are just a symptom of a larger, systemic issue (which is not to say they shouldn't be hunted for sport, that should still happen).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

    The "invisible hand of the market" is such a fascinating myth, because it frames the results of capitalist endeavors as inevitable and almost holy - but as soon as the sufficiently wealthy and well-connected suffer a setback, then "government bailouts" are granted.

    The invisible hand is actually very visible of you dare to look close enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago

    The basic supply & demand, “invisible hand of the market” stuff applies at like. A farmer’s market. This is the context Adam Smith was talking about when he made up the invisible hand phrase. If one farmer has cheaper produce than another, he’ll probably get more customers. Anything more complicated than a local farmer’s market is… more complicated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    So I saw a few relevant newspieces:

    ~ Companies are now ceasing their mandate to workers to use AI to do things that used to be done without AI. They're now saying don't use AI just to use AI. They're trying to reduce their token purchases.

    ~ The estimation now for AI use cases is to reconsider if tokens cost ten times their current price. If the use case is still worth it, then that use case will likely survive the bubble. If it's not worth it, it's time to hire back employees.

    ~ The hyperscale AI industry will have to make $6 trillion annually to break even. Amazon makes $2 trillion by selling people material stuff. Walmart is similar. There may not be a market for $6 trillion in tokens every year, even from government projects. Also, it's a bad sign if government projects are propping up the whole stock market.

    ~ China is mostly turning to a software AI model which does home and small business AI tasks fairly well without buying compute from a hyperscaler. You get a gaming machine, get open source AI software and a dozen terabytes of training data, and you should be able to create slop, vibe code or fix the grammar and style of your report. Also, hyperscale models are opinionated and don't like certain topics. Home-grown AI doesn't have those objections.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 hours ago

    Also, hyperscale models are opinionated and don't like certain topics. Home-grown AI doesn't have those objections.

    Unless you create or review the training data and train your model yourself, home grown AI models do have those objections.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah but how do we PROFIT off of it?! Fuck capitalism because this is a valid question

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 hours ago

    An investment that would pay off if the tech industry went to hell would be Put options on QQQ (an ETF that tracks the NASDAQ-100). You have to get both the timing and the drop correct, and better funded groups with much faster computers AND the ability to make trades to prop up the market while they unload their shit will be competing against you (every options trade has an opposite side and most of them expire worthless). Watch the movies Margin Call and The Big Short for research as much as playing the lottery can be researched (they're good movies so it's time well spent anyway). Make a movie night out of it and watch The Other Guys which was directed by the same guy who directed The Big Short. Watch through the end credits.

    I didn't read the article because gizmodo, but as other people here have said, Dr. Burry (he's played by Christian Bale in The Big Short) often thinks things are going to go south, and there's usually reason to think so, but in general as Warren Buffett could easily have said, "stonks only go up." NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT make around 15% or so of the entire world stock market and around 20% of the US market. Nobody's going to let them collapse and even without the AI craze they still have all the other stuff to fall back on. Thumbs will go on the scale to an extent even greater than the 2008 collapse.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›