top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 2 days ago (1 child)

I'm on fully on team Fuck AI.

but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.

Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News' catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

    It's currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 159 points 4 days ago (8 children)

    Trump calling it “Super Intelligence” only for the government’s own AI to contradict his election claims is almost too perfect. Apparently even a chatbot trained under his administration looked at the evidence and said: nope. Then came the inevitable upgrade: stop answering political questions before the machine commits any more inconvenient acts of fact checking.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    Imagine if this is what gets AI shutdown across the country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 3 days ago (26 children)

    This is why I'll never believe the claim that AI will save humanity. It may well give the answers to "save us" but we already know the answer. We just don't care. We're not going to listen to AI if we don't listen to ourselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 3 days ago (16 children)

    It's a language calculator. It has no intrinsic incentive to tell the truth, it just processes words.

    There is no reason to trust AI's reasoning on what could "save us" even if it offered one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    Right, its answer would be a distillation of what humans have written on the topic of how to save us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    what humans have written

    a highly curated selection that panders to the views of the AI's sponsors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 61 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    As delusional as AI can be, they don't even begin to approach the psychotic insanity of the child rapist and his magats.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    How long till this thing gets prompt injected and starts spilling secrets?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 3 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Trump's reaction was probably something along the lines of "shut up stupid piggy, you are stupid and fake, also ugly. I am going to call you pig intelligence from now on."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 3 days ago (9 children)

    It freaks out if you tell it to play Minecraft.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    I tried to bankrupt the US of A by having token paid by their taxes. But it refuse to answer legitimate frog language questions about the best croissant.

    Merde

    I shall ask if there is a government program or agency for classifying the best croissant and bakery across the US, for food safety reasons, obviously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    I think a new name would be better; North American Super Intelligence in short NASI.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    New executive order: From now on we're calling it "Stupid Intelligence!"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Imagine getting felted by your own AI that was designed to agree with you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago

    Please please I really hope they will force US companies to start calling their chatbots SI instead of AI, and forbid them from using the term AI.

    That would be such a funny PR/marketing nightmare. It's such a cringe term :D

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Can not provide commentary. See also: will not go into a conversation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    It's not too bad honestly. It wouldn't tell me how to center a div, which it stated was out of the scope of its purpose.

    I asked it a citizenship question and it did a good job linking resources to find that question, which is honestly an issue with our current government websites.

    The best feature seems to be that it will just tell you it doesn't know instead of making up some bullshit.

    Not something I would call "Super Intelligent", but good enough for the purpose it was given.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago

    They locked it down pretty hard to answer only government questions

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 4 days ago (7 children)

    Need a bot to attack it and run up their bill, credit use.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    OP: update your title, its america.gov, america[.]org is at the very least incorrect, and at the worst a pre-weaponized typosquatted domain

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 15 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Someone ask it about the Epstein files. Not the ones that weird guy from the FBI laid his paws on.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago*

    This would be funnier if any of them had an ounce of self-awareness and shame. As it is- those that should really take a lesson from this, won’t.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago

    I’m sure this was done in a financially responsible and small government way, right republicans?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    If I could destroy AI, I would definetly do it and say fuck your stupid ass bitch ass Trump🤣🖕

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›