To be fair, having read the article, it seems reasonable to not have a bigger welfare bill, presumably bigger than previous years.
“And the best thing, especially for young people who at the moment are too often locked out of any future, the best thing we can offer is not a benefits payment, but a first job with a wage and with a future.”
It sounds to me like the proposal is to help cut the welfare bill by providing ways for people to gain jobs, which seems completely reasonable.
Doesn't that seem fair, to provide skills and training instead of just money?
all 9 comments