Brace for another administration of austerity and victim blaming rather than taxing the wealthy.

Surely, it's the people who are ill, poor and foreign who are to blame for the state of the country, and not the rich sucking up all the money.

As far as I can tell, this is just trying soften the blow and curtail the pushback these policies will inevitably face.

The time to cut funding, if ever, is when things are going great. That is the opposite of how things are now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 12 hours ago* (4 children)

To be fair, having read the article, it seems reasonable to not have a bigger welfare bill, presumably bigger than previous years.

“And the best thing, especially for young people who at the moment are too often locked out of any future, the best thing we can offer is not a benefits payment, but a first job with a wage and with a future.”

It sounds to me like the proposal is to help cut the welfare bill by providing ways for people to gain jobs, which seems completely reasonable.

Doesn't that seem fair, to provide skills and training instead of just money?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago

    One of the problems with this is that a large number of those claiming universal credit are in work, and the benefit acts as a subsidy for employers who don't have to pay their employees enough to actually get by.

    It also doesn't affect PIP, which is not means tested. The only way to reduce PIP claimants without harming disabled people is to fix the absolutely humongous issues with the NHS that are leaving more people without treatment or even a diagnosis for far longer than it should.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

    Trying to make it easier to get jobs is good and all, we definitely need more and better entry-level jobs, but there are some people who cannot work because they are carers, parents or disabled.

    This administration has continued to talk about cutting support for disabilities, after doing exactly that under Starmer. What that does is make disabled people homeless as they have to choose between housing and medicine or food. They are unable to make it out fo the house anymore, so they can't work. It's way more expensive than just giving people support.

    People with mental health issues, the ones most targetted, have their help taken away or denied, preventing them from being able to recover and hold a job.

    If the administration really wanted people to get back to work, they would vastly increase the funding and availability of mental health services and the NHS. They would make easier to get benefits and housing so you don't get stuck in a beurocratic spiral instead of getting better.

    A healthy public is a productive one.

    I just don't trust the current Labour. I called Labour under Starmer "Forced Labour" and a change in Leader does not feel like it is enough. Shabana Mahmood and Wes Streeting still hold positions of power, is this really a new government? So far, it's better than Starmer, but disabled people, trans people and poor people always fall through the cracks or are actively abused. I'll believe this administration is different when I see it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago

    Creating jobs and helping people onto them is the solution, but actually doing that is very difficult. It’s a complicated and multi-faceted issue that needs a real strategy to solve, and I haven’t seen much signalling that is really being worked on.

    What we have seen too many times in the past though is a few ineffective token programs being put out as an excuse to gut welfare provisions, leaving people high and dry.

  • source
  • parent