all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Why are the permits even an option in the first place?

Corporate penalties need to be recurring (eg daily) and a % of annual revenue, not just fixed numbers.

And it needs to be hitting the Board of Directors personally.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 days ago* (3 children)

    I've said this for going on 2 decades now.

    Having these fines from the 1930s arent hurting companies today, they are just a minor inconvenience.

    Now, make the fines start at 40% of last years gross revenue (before they can do any tricky accounting to avoid shit by making their net income artificially lower, and also while accounting for any parent company/subsidiary bullshit), and it will cease to be an evil tax and start to be an actual fucking threat to the company.

    and if the company fails and falls because of it, well, thats their fault. No one forced them to be evil and vile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Plus a fine issued directly to the C suite, calculated the same way. Calculated on total pretax package and stock values. Make the decision makers fine payers and their "fiscal conservatism" might come in to play.

    In a successful society these people would be prosecuted and jailed for crimes against humanity, failing that I wouldn't mind seeing a few dozen billionaires and millionaires wind up in debtors prison.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    DataOne got hit with the fine after an investigation by The Guardian and Floodlight News in August shared thermal drone footage showing that 45 of the 62 gas generators were operating. 

    Woah, wtf. They didn't just build them. They were already in operation!?!

    Why the fuck are journalists capturing this after the fact? Why aren't there government inspectors visiting the site to approve it before they're allowed to start operation?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    That'll show 'em not to make tens of millions of dollars by breaking the law!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    That's like the cost of maybe two of the generators at the going prices now. Cost of doing business for them. Make it a million a day until they remove them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    Are you sure the fine isn't recurring?

    Edit: seems like they'll be fined again in 45 days if they don't get a permit or stop them running

    DataOne was given 45 days to apply for the permits or else cease operations, but they can continue operating the gas engines while seeking permits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    oh wow a whole 1million dollars.

    I'm sure that'll show them, and totally isnt just a rounding error in their budget.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • The residents know the data center is powering Microsoft’s AI tools like Copilot and worry DataOne will do whatever it takes to keep that deal in place.

    Sounds like they should fine Microsoft too, then.

    That's like the clothing company Gap selling sweat shop clothing (made by slaves) and then fining the factory but not Gap.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    To bad that drone didn't also have grenades.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 child)

    You know an actual solution? They get bulldozed by the city.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment