submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
 

Hello everyone, I need help to decide on a Linux Distribution to settle and finally stop distro hopping. I have quite some experience with Linux(1year Mint, a quarter year Arch, nixos, debian, manjaro, fedora, suse tumbleweed and kalpa...)I have been experimenting for now almost 3 years. Now I finally want to setlle but I just don't know where. I like Nix's shell but don't like installing everything in five steps(with git because my brain can stand neither the dirty tree warning nor leaving out on the git push) and I don't need the reproducibility. I like rolling so I don't need to reinstall or do any major update, but even more appealing is low maintenance and stability in the sense of nothing unexpectedly breaking. I'll use the computer as an daily driver mostly for programming & 3d design, university related work, streaming and also some gaming. Thank you for your answers. #linux #distrohopping. EDIT: I don't want to have a company behind my distribution. And my specs: Nvidia RTX 4070, Amd Radeon 7 7840HS, 16GB of RAM

Conclusion: Thanks a lot for all of that feedback, I decided to go for Debian 13 Stable and might check out MX once.

The final conclusion :P: I will now install LMDE and either try to install KDE Plasma or just stick with Cinnamon. Its not as uncustomizable after all. And the flashbacks I got during the installation from me first stepping into Linux... ...definetly the rabbit hole I should have fallen into, even though I can now never live a normal life again :/.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 24 points 6 days ago (17 children)

I always vote for boredom, which means I vote for Debian. It's a well rounded, reliable and solid OS. It can be a bit dated on some packages but it rewards with very low maintenance. It works. It does what it is supposed to do, which is allowing us to run and use our computer as we see fit.

You want something a bit more up to date? Move to Mint. If Debian still appeals to you, move to LMDE.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago (13 children)

    I'd recommend LMDE over Ubuntu Mint. There isn't much point to ubuntu mint anymore to be honest

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    I guess they're very similar overall. The main advantage I see for Mint/Ubuntu over LMDE/Debian is hardware and driver support. On Ubuntu you get much more recent versions for the kernel, Mesa, Nvidia drivers, ... from the HWE stack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    I'd say that if you're using such up to date hardware that you need the latest kernels and drivers, you probably don't need the handholding of mint, so you might want to prefer fedora or arch or smth, and not Mint/Ubuntu.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    I don't think people with new hardware are typically more technically competent... I think it depends more on the use case and how much money people are willing to spend. I think there are a lot of gamers that are quite new to Linux. But, e.g., right now Debian stable doesn't support the Nvidia 50 series at all (released in January 2025).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    Bias : I use debian for my own machine.

    I have two machines on Mint I am responsible for; one craptop with LMDE and one tower for my Mrs with Ubuntu Mint.

    I hate fucking about with the tower more than the craptop. The laptop is just as easy to use and was just as easy to install and everything. The only thing I needed to do was to replace cinnamon with XFCE in an attempt to make it run faster since the craptop has like 2gb ram.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    I've settled on CachyOS, using Bazaar for flatpaks (I avoid the AUR). I get a rolling os with frequent updates and more or less secure and verified apps. It's been a year, no problem so far.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 days ago

    Fedora is a great choice.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 6 days ago* (6 children)

    I had a similar journey and at some point settled for Debian.

    I know, everyone around here will tell you how basic that is and how much program versions lag behind sometimes, but I have come to the conclusion that this really doesn't bother me on daily use.

    The main wow moment was, when the I noticed my system was running for 5 years and nothing ever broke.

    Sure, I sometimes miss the AUR or some of the bells and whistles off bleeding edge distros, but in the end I want my main daily driver as a tool to other stuff, not a project to constantly put effort in.

    The beauty of Debian is, its reliable AF, everything you got working once stays working, in 99,99% of cases even with a major version change, its the best documented and tested system and it does everything I need and more.

    Plus with KDE plasma and all the native programs, like kdeconnect, kdenlive, kget etc I dont miss out on convinience. (Sure I could still use them on other distros, but I like how it is integrated into a good user experience with the option to tweak everything but without the need to do so)

    The main down site imho is that some advanced things which may work in a hacky and time consuming way on arch just will not work on Debian at all, but I seldom have such moments and its a small price to pay for a system that's just won't brake from where I stand.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    everyone around here will tell you how basic that is and how much program versions lag behind sometimes

    which mostly show people don't know they one can add a repository and fix that, my Firefox is 2 days old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    And that repository is flathub. Stable base for the OS, bleeding edge rolling release for the apps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 6 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

    I used to be a Fedora guy until IBM bought them and they killed CentOS. I first used Red Hat in middle school back in the nineties, so it broke my heart to leave, but I settled on OpenSUSE. It's non-US based, and it feels just as polished, if not more than Fedora. I use Tumbleweed, which is their rolling release distro.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago

    It actually happens naturally, or it should at least. So don't mind anyone. Distrohop until you find yourself settled.

    You seem to know enough distros. If none of them exactly clicked with you perfectly, continue your search.

    I stayed on Arch-based for more than 10 years and it was suppose to be temporary for me as I was keep saying that to myself. In reality I was settled. So, don't mind others, find it yourself. It will happen sooner ot later.

    P.S.

    Void is good.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago*

    Personnaly CachyOS has been the one to stop my distro hopping, though I must say, I 'm an arch linux fan, so Cachy did it for me. All of the Fedora based distros I've tried were good at the beginning but felt limited at some point, though this is specific to my use cases. But one that I really liked, and I'm not much of a debian person usually was PikaOS, so I'd recommend trying it out if not already done.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago
    [–] 9 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Undoubtedly Void Linux. Rolling but very stable, and a good community.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago

    CachyOS, it is the way

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago

    Of course, Gentoo Linux! :)

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago

    Why not Debian? If you don't have any specific reason for choosing something else, that seems like the obvious choice.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago

    maybe void? its rolling relase, stable and boring in a good way

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago

    Choosing a distro to stay on is a personal decision, it's not one we can make for you. The real solution to distrohopping is to just keep doing it until you don't feel like doing it anymore. There's a spectrum between (trying new things and being unhappy) and (being lazy and settling). That's a scale only you can feel.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago*

    Try MX Linux. I've used lots of distros, but I always go back to MX as my daily driver.

    Based on Debian. Good mix of non-invasive built-in utilities. Really good GUI package manager. And Yakuake terminal built in.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    I use void btw. No systemd (your mileage may vary depending on the desktop environment) and have not embraced slop, at least yet.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    Given the specs of your system, if you want productivity and gaming, I'll suggest Bazzite. It runs Fedora atomic under the hood so it is extremely stable. It comes with everything you need for gaming. Installing additional software is trivial with flatpaks using Bazaar. Overall it meets all your criteria. It has been my daily driver for a couple of years and I think I've found my distro.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago

    Ah too bad you didn't like nix. I was just about to propose a simple home-manager repo which could at least declare your tooling across any distro.

    while I don't understand the git problem, since versioning your OS/tooling is a major feature not a headache, you seem too have found a place with debian so go ahead.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    I can only tell you that I'm using CachyOS (Arch) with Wayland and the latest Noctalia, which is extremely customizable. I'm very content. My compositor is Hyprland, but Niri or Mango work, too. Noctalia even technically works with KDE, which I also used for quite some time, but I wouldn't recommend using it on top of it. Noctalia (Hyprland) has been a standard installation option in the CachyOS .iso ever since August 2026.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    To be honest, it sounds like you've tried the prime candidates. You probably know better than us which one fits you best. Ultimately, I also think that it doesn't make that much of a difference for an advanced user. You can probably get almost any distro to do what you want.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    I wouldn't call myself a distrohopper, but over the last 30 years I've daily-driven Slackware, Gentoo, Ubuntu (and derivates), Manjaro and now landed on EndeavourOS for the last four years.

    I enjoy the vast and up-to-date software that pacman and AUR have, but I don't really need the exercise in system installation/building any more. So EndeavourOS it is.

    I've tried OpenSUSE and NixOS on virtual machines from time to time. I like, but I feel they'd be in the way for my computing needs at the moment.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    I like Arch for this. Ten years ago I wouldn't have recommended it, but it's been a great decade for me. Rolling distro means not many big changes at any one time. Don't have to reimage to cleanly install newer release. Arch maintainers are excellent, updates rarely cause problems. Not perfect of course, but you get up-to-date software and an amazing community.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 6 days ago

    My main conflict point with Arch is the maintenance factor. Whilst my priorities have been the bleeding edge for a long time, by now my thinking has been shifting more towards stability and being able to just use it. That's what I loved about openSUSE Slowroll, but I don't want to have a company behind it. And it had a KPM version mismatch resulting in broken nvidia driver.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago
    [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    I go into distro-hop frenzies every 3 to 6 months. Last run Included EndeavourOS and CachyOS. I did stay in CachyOS for a couple of months, and used it to give some windows managers a chance, turns out I'm a DE kind of guy. Ended up back on Fedora, as it invariably happens, only this time I went with KDE. I'm a sucker for the GNOME workflow, but KDE is infinitely lighter on resources and way more customizable, so I now have a Plasma desktop that looks and behaves like Gnome.

    In terms of cutting edge and almost never breaking, and if it does break, just reboot and choose the previous good kernel, Fedora has never let me down. They did fuck up horribly last week with kernel 7.2.5, lol.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago

    Flip a friggin coin.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago*

    You don't need 5 steps or git if you want to install software. Either add to your Config and do the rebuild switch or if you don't want to have a reproducible config just use this to install a package such as pulse audio volume control.

    nix-env -iA nixos.pavucontrol

    This site gives you tabs with options on what install method suits your needs

    https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=26.05&query=Pavu#show=pavucontrol

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 days ago

    fwiw: distro hopping is an easy way to stay up to date on the things that are happening in the linux world.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    I’d definitely give PikaOS a try. I’ve been using it and honestly really like it so far. I’ve bounced around between a few different distros, but PikaOS has been one of the easiest to just install and start using.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›