all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 1 hour ago

He keeps using that word. I don't think he knows what it means.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 hour ago (8 children)

    This would be a big gamble for him, because if he drops nukes in Iran and Iranians still somehow maintain control of Hormuz, the US is oficially dead as a global superpower.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 34 minutes ago (3 children)

    Send a nuke, expect to get a nuke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 26 minutes ago (2 children)

    I doubt Russia or China would start a nuclear exchange with the US over Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 16 minutes ago (1 child)

    That's fair of you to think that. I think, however, that russia has been waiting for an excuse to use their nuclear devices.

    China not so much. They are too fond of the economy and prefer to just supply both sides with components.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 12 minutes ago*

    That’s fair of you to think that. I think, however, that russia has been waiting for an excuse to use their nuclear devices.

    Indeed, but they wouldn't attack the US, they would use the US usage of nuclear weapons in Iran as an excuse to use them in Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 27 minutes ago

    I mean, nukes would guarantee nuclear fallout hitting at least one of the neighboring nations, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE. That would set in stone our rank of dead last as a potential partner in all things military, trade, monetary, etc. The fallout would likely permanently fuck up the strait, so insuring tankers in the strait might be impossible at that point, so passage would be pointless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 minutes ago

    Trump proving the pro-nuke faction in Iran right again.

  • source