top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 114 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Last military leader with military experience and the only one since to earnestly speak out against the military industrial complex.

He's a legitimately interesting dude.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    He was not the last; JFK also had military experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Jfk was al not a military leader in the military, he was a serviceman in a minor role. Eisenhower was a literal general and was in leadership roles from 1918 to 1945ish iirc. ≠ jfk had a military understanding whereas Eisenhower had military leadership experience which is why I phrased it the way I did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Okay I see now what you meant. However, what you said was "last military leader with military experience". JFK was commander in chief as the president (I.e., military leader) and was in the military (I.e., military experience).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Kennedy won a medalmof Honor for his service. George HW Bush was shot down in WWII.

    But neither were military leaders, which is what I think he was referring to. Ike was the commander of the largest military alliance in the history of the world prior to becoming President. When he spoke out against the MIC, he did it from a position of absolute understanding.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I don't know a lot about him, and I'm fairly confident that I'd think he was an imperialist chud, but I rember his fairwell address being kinda based in a lot of ways:

    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 53 points 1 week ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 49 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    These Republicans were actually Liberals, this was the "Party of Lincoln". The democrats at the time were conservatives.

    The political poles literally flipped around 1965.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    For those wondering, it wasn't some quick, clean swap. It lasted from the 30's through the 60's, so when conservatives say "oh yeah, but what about...", their tiny rat brains can't imagine that it took conservatives over 30 years to steal the Republican Party from the progressives. They called their theft The Southern Strategy and made little secret of it.

    Conservatives have always been evil and will always be evil. Always.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The political poles literally flipped around 1965.

    How would you reconcile that statement with the Democratic Party under FDR (well before 1965?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 48 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Isn't this before the Southern strategy?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 week ago (20 children)

    Perfect example of why the political party system is pointless. I’d argue if anything it’s a tool used to undermine the whole democratic process

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (17 children)

    Haha yeah we should have a single party compose only of workers with representatives paid only as much as their average constituant and subject to instant recall 👀

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (16 children)

    That would be AuThOrItArIaN!

    Anyway, you have to Vote Blue NO MATTER WHO!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    The town of Cheran in Mexico got rid of their corrupt mayor who is in the pocket of cartels. They also got rid of political parties because they believe it only cause divisions. The town then adopted an anarchist system whereby they elect a leader once a year. They set up their own militia patrols. So far, they've been successful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 week ago

    The same president who warned of the rise of the military-industrial complex.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Before the Southern Strategy

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 1 week ago
    [–] 5 points 1 week ago*

    During the great depression the US of pedos even toyed with the idea of "technocratism". Alas.

  • source
  • Banana republic man. Love to see some great party switch content.

    At some point in time both parties were equally racist, blood-thirsty and anti-communist, then the Republican party went above and beyond for more votes.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    People like the 50s econmics.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago*

    "Lost the plot" would suggest there was an accident or mistake at some point. They tied the plot up and left it gagged in a disused gas station restroom off the freeway in the middle of nowhere, after assaulting it with a rusty tire iron.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    White* low-income families

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    One of our top 5 presidents, in my barely educated opinion.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    A wild Richard Nixon carrying a bucket of watergate and liberal elitism appears

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›