At a small restaurant in Tennessee, USA.

I don't like that they asked an LLM to graphic design the entire menu, but why in the name of robot jesus did they look at the result and say "great. Love it. Print 100 copies."

The food pictures made me physically ill. They're really upsetting! I told the Waitress, who agreed that the pics were awful, and the manager/owner(?) who didn't seem to care.

There are LLM inconsistencies all over, too, like icons changing from page to page.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 177 points 3 weeks ago* (31 children)

I'm sorry if this offends anyone, but I swear, a swathe of the older population seems to have "diffusion blindness." They can glance at images like this and think its acceptable for their business, like something about their perception just softens the uncanny valley.

Hence, Facebook, in its current state.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 3 weeks ago* (16 children)

    I imagine many of them have vision so deteriorated that they literally can't see the difference. And I will remind you, these people are still allowed to drive.

    This is especially absurd in the context of it already being a restaurant. "How are we going to get pictures for the menu, boss?"

    Gee, I dunno. Maybe just make the meal in question and take a fucking picture of it? You are running a restaurant, so I have to charitably assume that somebody there is capable of cooking whatever it is, and plating it up, and sticking it on the cleanest table in the joint for a couple of seconds. For being printed at 72 DPI and the size of a postage stamp anyway, using your cell phone to take the picture will be just fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 3 weeks ago* (9 children)

    Taking a good looking picture of food is not actually all that easy, professionals earn(ed) a lot of money doing it.

    That said i 100% prefer a casual real picture over the promotional art in a menu. I want to see what i am getting and i mean prefer it over the professional photo. Ai food looks absolutely disgusting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago*

    Ehhhh, a smartphone with a common "food" filter and a decent angle on the food does a fairly good job these days. The small sensor actually gives just the right amount of depth of field, whereas a big camera would have to stop down or focus stack anyway.

    I agree with the sentiment though. Running a business is hard; they only have so much energy, so corners have to be cut, and they clearly tried to cut the media budget they'd need to stage every meal on the menu.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 90 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    The power move was to tell the manager, and then leave afterwards without ordering anything.

    Let them see the direct consequences of their actions, money walking out the door.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 82 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 51 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    THAT TOTALLY LOOKS LIKE HUMAN FOOD WHICH I SHALL CONSUME WITH MY…FOOD PORT.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 38 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    That shit doesn't even look like food.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    The trouble with food that looks like that, you have to keep an eye on it. Whenever you look elsewhere there's a faint rustling noise, you catch a rapid movement in your peripheral vision and look back, only to see it has taken a different form. Chances are all the photos on the menu were actually the same dish. Is it alive? Is it sentient? Is it one organism or many? Such questions lose their meaning with food like this.

    Oh and don't eat it because you won't be human any more

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is some sloppy slop.

    Anyone that cares this little about how their food is represented before ordering, doesn't care about the food or customer. It saved the owner $50 one time, and that was worth it.

    Sorry, Riverstone Restaurant, but fuck off with this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    How hard is it to take a picture of the food after it's been prepared??? God damn...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Not that I'm on their side, but it can take a lot of prep and experience to take good food pics. Now having said that, often my favorite places have pictures that are decades old and faded, and probably weren't great pictures to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    yeah it takes prep and time, unless you just take pics of the food you're vending and be honest.

    there's an idea. just advertise what you're selling. wild huh?

    anyway, both prepared pics and casual shots are better than literal fucking nightmare fuel.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago

    Whats wrong honey? You've barely touched your needle skillet.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's really not hard to do normally. Almost everybody has a smart phone with a reasonably good camera on it. Take a clean table, turn on all the lights, make each dish with a little extra care so it looks nice, and take a picture of it. You don't even have to pay anybody.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Hi there. Yeah, I'll have the glistening yellow blorbs on whiteflats, fried 𝔾𝔼𝕆𝕄𝔼𝕋ℝ𝕐, waves o' bacon aaaaand a slice of geographic meat. Do you do ōᴹᴹēᴸᴸēᵀᵀē with 🅀🅄🄱🄴🄼🄴🄰🅃? Cool, one of those too.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Some look like plastic, some look like dogfood, and the second image is wigging out my trypophobia 🤮

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I've seen these AI food menus all over the place here in Vancouver. It sucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (22 children)

    Off topic I guess, but I was surprised that nobody is talking about the asterix: Eating undercooked food might make you sick. Like, yeah, that's your job to avoid? I'm assuming this is about runny egg yolks but still, is this considered normal in the US?

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Ok, I'm not a fan of generative content anyway, but sometimes it's at least saving effort. I'm confused how a restaurant, who presumably makes and serves these meals, couldn't just take pictures of the meals instead of doing this? Surely that'd be easier, and you'd have an outcome that actually represents your product. This is just insane, and shows a total disregard for what they're making. I'd love (hate) to see what their refrigerator and kitchen look like if they put so little care into the menu that's facing the customer.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I glanced at it and though it was bad. Then I zoomed in and it’s so much worse!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    I'm in Kenya at the moment and it seems nearly all restaurant menus are made with AI. It's awful and I keep asking if the food is real as the photos aren't.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    and the manager/owner(?) who didn’t seem to care.

    The owner. That's the one who did it I bet anything. This is typical owner-type psychopathy. A manager would want customers at least. An owner thinks the money spawns in their bank account because they're "good at runnin buisness."

    And not a single one of these pieces of shit ever admits to generating it. Its always "Oh uh is it AI though? Looks pretty real. How can you tell it's AI? I'll take your for it but I don't see what the big deal is. It's the future though so we might as well get used to it."

    Come on "AI artists" and "prompt engineers". Why don't you take credit for your "legitimate" work?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Those pictures make me feel like some decent psychedelics are about to kick in.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Forget the visuals for a second and tell me how $17 for an omelette is anywhere near okay.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago

    No pictures at all would be vastly preferable. I'd've walked out.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    That's when you let them know you're walking out and why.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I figued it was fake, but ... they have a toned down version here https://www.riverstonefamilyrestaurant.com/menu

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    So don't fucking eat there.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    LMFAO It's cheaper to order your meal as sides. The "Riverstone" comes out to $9.48

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

    They probably thought taking photos of their dishes would have been complicated or expensive. Funny thing, if they were going for this overall aesthetic, then taking the photos with a cellphone (no matter how crap and outdated) and slapping Instagram filters (or equivalents) on them would have worked beautifully. Anything is better than this.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    The food looks like the kind of thing that would be used as a lure by a massive carnivorous slime mold shaped like a mom and pop restaurant.

    Weird things do grow in the hollers of Appalachia.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    WTF is "city ham"? Is that like "long pig"?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    I could get generating the layout, but the whole point of the pictures is that I want to see what your version of this dish looks like

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    That shit looks so disgusting that it would ruin my appetite

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    Sunny side up eggs topped with spiders and a side of cheese nails.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Feels like a truth in advertising moment, but with what enforcement? As others have said, voting with your dollars is the best leverage you have.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    What, do you not flower cookie cutter your eggs and put stitch patterns on your pancakes? That's how you know it's made with love.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    Yummy, I love eating nauseatingly detailed geometrical patterns 😋

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    yeah ive seen ai food on delivery apps too, i've ended up just not ordering anything

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›