all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

Tangent here, but something I have never understood quite frankly is why cars are sold being able to go past 80mph in the first place.

Granted that is probably not the factor to worry about in cases like in New York, but I recall hearing about this speed limiting enforcement for repeat offenders in VA:
https://www.ghsa.org/news/new-virginia-bill-would-put-speed-limiters-cars-convicted-reckless-drivers

It's crazy to me why anyone needs a car that goes beyond 80. In the city, you don't even need to actually go that fast and won't likely have the opportunity, although as I'm told often YMMV.

I know this post isn't really talking about speeding deaths but speeding is still reckless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 8 hours ago

    The fewer people drive, the better.

    I saw someone hit a kid on a bike by Atlantic terminal, and they just drove off. Luckily the kid was fine, because I guess teenagers are indestructible and the car wasn't going that fast. But that reckless asshole needs consequences.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

    Need more than that, and everywhere. There was a death literally outside my building just a couple months ago from a hit and run. 13 year old boy on an e-scooter obeying the law saying you can't be on the side wall with it. We even heard the whole thing, including the mother's cry seeing the body.

    All up and down this Blvd, there are memorials to victims of hit and runs. It's disgusting the best LA is willing to do is amp up police presence, especially since this is a low income neighborhood.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    Fortunately LA has invested very heavily into public transit. There are plenty of spots that could use a subway line, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

    The plan also calls for state lawmakers to pass a proposed “Drugged Driving Bill,” which would allow prosecutors to charge drivers using drugs that impair driving.

    This isn't already a thing?

    It further called for lawmakers to pass legislation allowing the seizure of license plates from reckless drivers and to establish higher penalties for repeat offenders.

    Too lenient IMO and it's a start.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago

    This isn’t already a thing?

    It is, but this would call it out and give specific penalties. Driving impaired under any circumstances is already illegal. I recall a story where someone took Kava Kava and got a DUI over it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

    Lol you expect leftist prosecutor to prosecute drug users? THAT'S RACIST

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 hours ago

    Alright I'm just gonna ask: is Mamdani a lemmy user?? So many of his policies are stuff we agree with

  • source
  • tear up roads, put down paths and bike paths

    fully invest in subways

    fully invest in not just state high speed rail but also new england and tri state regional high speed rail to get from nyc to rochester in like 2 hours

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Carceral solutions are never the answer.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment