This article is a masterpiece in cherry-picking. It's amazing how stupid this kind of pieces can get.
First example: Jasmine Paris in the Barkleys. She was 5th in 2024. The first 4 were all men. No mention of that in the article, even though it directly contradicts the premise of the article. It's insulting for an athlete of the calibre of Paris, who doesn't need this kind of drivel to be recognised as an extraordinary runner in her own right.
Second example: Spine race. Two women topped in 2025 but in 2026 it was five men again at the top.
The next examples are picked out of a forest of results where men massively dominate the field. See this year's UTMB. First woman is 26th.
I have no idea what the article is actually trying to demonstrate. Yes there are amazing female runners, but we have enough statistics with all the races run yearly to show that women usually don't beat men in endurance running.
all 7 comments