In 1973 a reportedly drunk driver flattened a tree in the middle of the Sahara, which sounds unremarkable until you learn it was the only tree for 250 miles around, a 300-year-old acacia so isolated it was marked on maps covering half a continent. https://share.google/ePM21R48Aq0VRqTUb

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 4 hours ago

For the curious ones. The tree was rather small and the monument was errected at the site the tree was at.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 9 hours ago

    I like the fact that what they replaced it with will definitely kill the next driver ramming into it.

    PS. Please update your link OP. No one wants to be tracked by Google. Another commenter provided the non-Google link.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    This was a cool and sad read. The end of an era thanks to human stupidity. Id like to have known how long the tree could've lived naturally before finally succumbing to old age.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

    Source: patkgreen fom a reddit post 14 years ago answering the question "do trees die of old age?"

    The answer, of course, is sort of. Like another poster said, old age is technically a secondary cause. What happens when a tree gets old is that it can't protect most of its inner heartwood or exterior. It certainly does not fight damage as well.

    Woody plants heal through CODIT (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_of_decay_in_trees) in four steps, called walls. This is originally from a study where a guy named Shigo axed a bunch of trees and watched them heal.

    The four walls are explained in the wiki, but I'll simplify it.

    Wall 1: the tree prevents the wound/infection from spreading up and down the tree by blocking the transport tubes on either side of the wound.

    Wall 2: the tree prevents the wound/infection from spreading inward by building up a ring to act as a barrier

    Wall 3: the tree prevents the wound/infection from spreading circularly by sectioning the wound laterally. This basically means the wound/infection can't spread left or right. After wall 3, the would should look like a piece of pie.

    Wall 4: the new growth rings seal off the wound/infection so it doesn't spread outward, as the trunk grows.

    So in old age, the trees lose the ability to compartmentalize their wounds and eventually die. When wall 4 fails, you'll find a standing tree with a hollow inside- it's not uncommon to see them with leaves still. But unless wall 4 has succeeded just in the nick of time, the tree will die soon.

    Another way trees die is they girdle themselves because they get too big or something that is sucked up by the roots get caught in the xylem and phloem. Think of it as getting a piece of food caught in your throat. It slowly chokes and dies.

    Girdling is also a cause of death from insects and beavers. Most animals and insects only eat the newest part of the tree, where the xylem and phloem channels are active. This area, just under the bark, is called the cambium. When this cambium is eaten, the tree has no way to pass water/food/nutrients up and down the tree, essentially starving.

    When a tree is old enough for the bark to start falling off simple weathering is enough to damage the flow of food/water/nutrients and that is as close to dying of old age as a tree can get, in my experience.

    Lastly, some trees literally have no ceiling of growth (redwood, white pine) except for when the atmospheric pressure prevents the tree from getting its food/nutrients/water to the roots or leaves. In this case, they eventually die because they weaken and can no longer transport at a functional rate.

    As an edit: when trees get unhealthy, you'll see weird sucker sprouts along a normally bare stem, or lots of leaves in clusters in weird spots.

    source: professional ecologist

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

    Humans struggle with accepting that as we are now we're more or less a virus killing a host.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 19 hours ago

    We aren't killing the host. The host will go on, we're just destroying the growth medium for ourselves and other creatures.

    Something will go one even after we manage to wipe ourselves out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    Every day we stray closer to The Matrix

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 22 hours ago
    [–] 12 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

    How the hell do you manage to run into the only tree for 250 miles!!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

    Someone should replant it. Surely we have the technology.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago*

    We do and we might get back there eventually if we keep up with water harvesting techniques and permaculture designs in the region, which are aimed at greening the edge of Sahara

    Andrew Millison has a few episodes on this on his channel. For those interested, non YT links:

    How Africa's Great Green Wall is Solving an Ancient Conflict which shows projects in Chad

    How Refugees are Greening the Edge of the Sahara near the border with Sudan in Chad

    Inside Africa's Food Forest Mega-Project with projects in Niger

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

    New trees haven't been able to grow there for centuries. You'd have to spend a century giving the new tree progressively deeper irrigation until the roots reach the current water table, 40+m deep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 21 hours ago* (2 children)

    Yeah I realize it would require irrigation but that's very doable with modern technology.

    We could fundraise an electric truck to bring the water or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments