all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 46 minutes ago

chips like Intel's old Core 2 Duo, which comprises about 47 percent of their fleet

That’s just a crazy number and I was not aware how dated their systems were. On the other hand, never touch a running system.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

    as a Debian user: I wish they had chosen a distro that didn't just decide to accept slop contributions.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 49 minutes ago (2 children)

    Enjoy BSD then, because Linus Torvalds also uses LLM’s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 38 minutes ago*

    I mean they could have just picked Debian 12... I doubt Debian will make retroactive slop updates to older versions of the distro. At least that's what I'm doing on the systems I administer: set up a custom package that conflicts with base-files >= 13 and with some already-known slopified version numbers (thanks to Open Slopware) to keep things a bit more under control.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 41 minutes ago

    I mean if you want something that's stable and you really don't have to think about upgrading similar to Debian there's always NixOS. wee bit of a learning curve but once you have it configured you can pretty much forget about it. can even run stuff without installing it if you wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    The reason is old hardware support:

    The reason for all that was a compiler flag. When Red Hat builds RHEL, it picks a minimum CPU generation the software will run on. RHEL 9's cutoff already excludes CERN's oldest boards, the kind running chips like Intel's old Core 2 Duo, which comprises about 47 percent of their fleet.

    RHEL 10 raises that cutoff again, and this time even newer Ivy Bridge-generation boards, another 17 percent, fall on the wrong side of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment