you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 11 hours ago* (2 children)

I mean they could have just picked Debian 12... I doubt Debian will make retroactive slop updates to older versions of the distro. At least that's what I'm doing on the systems I administer: set up a custom package that conflicts with base-files >= 13 and with some already-known slopified version numbers (thanks to Open Slopware) to keep things a bit more under control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 child)

    Could have but

    1. I somehow doubt they did
    2. patches flow back into stable, too.

    I had to freeze rsync because of that :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago

    Thanks to how Debian versions packages, numero 2 is solved with a package solution like mine (liberal use of >> for package version comparison), so that you can't install the updates that come with slopification.

  • source
  • parent