you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 hours ago (11 children)

as a Debian user: I wish they had chosen a distro that didn't just decide to accept slop contributions.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

    Enjoy BSD then, because Linus Torvalds also uses LLM’s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

    He's not making slop patches to the kernel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 hours ago* (2 children)

    I mean they could have just picked Debian 12... I doubt Debian will make retroactive slop updates to older versions of the distro. At least that's what I'm doing on the systems I administer: set up a custom package that conflicts with base-files >= 13 and with some already-known slopified version numbers (thanks to Open Slopware) to keep things a bit more under control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 child)

    Could have but

    1. I somehow doubt they did
    2. patches flow back into stable, too.

    I had to freeze rsync because of that :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 hours ago

    Thanks to how Debian versions packages, numero 2 is solved with a package solution like mine (liberal use of >> for package version comparison), so that you can't install the updates that come with slopification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    I mean if you want something that's stable and you really don't have to think about upgrading similar to Debian there's always NixOS. wee bit of a learning curve but once you have it configured you can pretty much forget about it. can even run stuff without installing it if you wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment