all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0 points 2 hours ago*

Then you get people like Malcolm X who was so successfully demonized that his name still scares white folks, if they hear it said out loud.

Assassinated by the US government.

And then there's Fred Hampton. A name that they pretty successfully kept from becoming well known to begin with. Which is truly such a fucking shame.

Brutally assassinated by the US government while asleep in his bed.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    USA deifies someone seeking for change in class equality, after ignoring them, mocking them, vilifying them, making their life miserable and then when the history is written, they write their efforts being synonymous to "merican values" like everyone forgets how most of the country hated their guts.

    You can literally see it happening currently with ICE protestors. The population is either detached, apathetic or want them to suffer harshly, just for protesting.

    But one day everyone would have been against this and it'll be part of "merican values" not how the whole country didn't give a flying fuck about human rights and how it treats people in their country and around the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 23 hours ago

    He agitated for civil rights for a decade, but once he started the Poor People's Campaign and pivoted to talking about class instead of just race, he was killed within months.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 child)

    During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the “consolation” of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    When someone is in control of a movement large enough to potentially rise up to threaten the lives of those in power, they stop him by any means necessary. Once he's dead, though, they can point to him as the prime example of how nonviolence totally solves all the world's problems! Put that guy's name on a street in every town! They always thought he was great!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

    Totally agree except for the dig on nonviolence. Nonviolence nearly brought an end to the rampant racism in the US that has existed for hundreds of years. Violence was used to extend White Supremacy for another century in the US with the murder of Martin Luther King Jr.

    Clearly violence is the solution. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    Aren't you forgetting about the Black Panthers and the "violent" side of the civil rights movement? Violence is just a tool, it can be used for good or evil. And as much as I'd prefer to see the world improve without violence, I think any movement that gets too powerful will be forced to adopt violent countermeasures as a response to violent attacks from the ruling class.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    No, the Black Panthers were not a terrorist group and were far less violent than a typical biker gang. Violence is not a tool of good. Defending yourself with proportional violence is an unfortunate reality that people are faced with. This is more about survival though and not about advancing rights.

    I think you are romanticizing violence. Please explain how violence has advanced the cause of human rights. When has violence solved our social problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    There are certainly solutions to many problems that don't involve violence, but there are also situations where such options don't exist. The "violence doesn't solve anything" mantra has allowed us to become passive to the point where we honestly think that holding signs that say we're mad is enough to make politicians who have no intention of representing us at all magically change their mind. There are times that call for violence - the country was founded on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    That last bit is key to understanding US society. Violence has rarely worked in favor of the common US citizen, but has been used effectively to suppress them time and time again as we saw with the Civil Rights movement.

    Violence only solves things in one way and that way is the exact opposite of what the majority of people want who are looking to improve society. The violent nature of the US brought through war and neoimperialism has perverted the entire world ushering in a new age of global fascism.

    I shudder at the stupidity of people who think a violent revolution is going to fix things. That their rhetoric will magically rise from the ashes to create a better society. There are zero examples of this and most revolutions, saving perhaps the Haitain, were just wealthy groups using citizens as pawns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 20 hours ago

    I mean obviously they hated him, they were white

    Black people on the other hand overwhelmingly (84% in 1966) approved of him: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/16/politics/martin-luther-king-jr-polling-analysis

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah, especially all those people who weren't alive yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 23 hours ago

    Even sadder :Amerikkka: have given up violently challenging the quo.

  • source