all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 34 points 2 weeks ago*

The government equally restricts what private healthcare can do..

I don't want a national house building program, houses can set on fire!! Landlords only please. fedposting

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ahh yes, because a private insurance company would never deny paying for a service they deem unnecessary.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 2 weeks ago

    Castro's in for the surprise of his life when he tries to write with my poison pen

    sigh well, what has public healthcare done for the trans rights movement?

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 weeks ago

    Private healthcare in America first-time

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Brain worms flexing their strongest power level yet

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago

    How do we take advantage of this?

    “Uhhh…yeah, us trans folks will be doomed if medicare for all passes! I would be such an owned lib! I’d be crying in my safe space for weeks if woke brand healthcare couldn’t protect me!”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 weeks ago

    I've known liberals petty enough to oppose even a public option because the language in a preliminary vague bill didn't include their own medical issue (it wasn't specific about any)

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 weeks ago

    It’s like the believe the right wing myth of “woke brands” and somehow think porky is a champion of the oppressed.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    (haven't seen you around in a while, wb doggirl-happy )

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    Wasn't it just a few months ago that she was defending Newsom for some incremental provision of gender affirming healthcare in California?

    Girl just go be a California secessionist, and live your best life.

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 weeks ago