Switched from English to German. German UI design is very direct...

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago

    In German, it would be "Fick Dich!" So it should be "F K D".

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Who is Saait, though, and what did he do to deserve the hate?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Don't other text editors do the same for German?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Yeah, it's just your usual buttons:

    • BoldFett
    • ItalicKursiv
    • U͟n͟d͟e͟r͟l͟i͟n͟e͟d → U͟n͟t͟e͟r͟s͟t͟r͟i͟c͟h͟e͟n
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 17 hours ago* (1 child)

    oh, my. that third line is horrendous. that's what happens when the software (in this case, lemmy's md to html engine) tries to do the rendering instead of the browser. trying to underline using unicode.. and failing, instead of just using css.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 16 hours ago

    Oh man, I just checked what it looks like in Firefox:

    The underline after the first character and ends one character after the last.

    I had written that comment in the Jerboa app (and fiddled with it to make it look reasonable):

    The underline starts and ends in the middle of the first/last character.


    when the software (in this case, lemmy’s md to html engine) tries to do the rendering instead of the browser.

    And nope, in this case I added the Unicode for the underline myself. Well, I used this app. That passes straight through the MD→HTML conversion without being touched.
    And it actually is rendered by the browser, but yeah, by the browser's Unicode+font rendering, not the CSS engine. Or in case of Jerboa, by Android's Unicode+font rendering.
    Would certainly be nice, if these would look the same. 🫠

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 19 hours ago* (1 child)

    Truly a cursed way to underline a word, is there no better way to do it on Lemmy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

    Lemmy uses Markdown for storing/displaying comments, specifically the CommonMark flavor with some extensions, as documented here: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/02-media.html

    And yeah, no, that doesn't have a way to underline,

    except

    maybe

    one

    of

    these
    here,

    depending on the Markdown implementation in the client. Some clients might also choose to underline the highlighting, that's normally 𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘤.

    Links may be underlined as well.

    Well, and then you've also got this thing, which is certainly a line under this text:


    On Lemmy, we also got strikethrough. Priorities, I guess. 🙃

    But yeah, no proper, consistent underlining in Markdown/Lemmy. 🥴

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Anyone else remember INSERT STD

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Want to bet that this was no accident? Also I think it should never ever be changed cause it's funny and does not hurt anyone.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Bold is called 'fat' and italic 'cursive' in german lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    "Kursiv" really just translates back to "italic" despite being a cognate of "cursive". Outside one bad translation of a Simpsons episode, I have never heard connected handwriting referred to as "kursiv" in German.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

    "Kursive" (with an "e") technically means the same as "Schreibschrift" (aka handwriting developed for quick penning, generally attached). "Kursiv" (without "e") in turn means "italic". But despite being technically correct German it isn't commonly used.

    It's just like how in Dutch we do also have the word "italiek" for italic fonts, but it's rare to see it used and we generally use "cursief" (whereas what is called cursive in English is called "schrijfletters" in Dutch). Both are technically correct Dutch, but the first you will pretty much never see used by native speakers.

    I guess American shows sometimes find these kind of rare-but-technically-correct words when translating and run with it without realising no one actually uses that word. Which is indeed bad translating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    No, the translation I was referring to didn't say "Kursive", it said "kursiv", I definitely remember that. That was the episode with Cypress Creek and Hank Scorpio where Bart is asked whether he never learned cursive...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    I didn't mean to say the translation might have said "Kursive", just that the translators might have mixed that up due to the word existing (al be it rarely used) and being similar. Which as I said, is still horrible translating.

    It was just meant as an explanation what might have happened to make them translate it to that, especially if the translators aren't native speakers. My partner is now learning Dutch and I noticed some study books are full of these kind of bad translations, both in using rarely used words and using simply the wrong words. And to add to that, Americans trying to do Dutch is even worse, especially on TV shows 🥲. Most of the time they feature "Dutch" it's impossible to know what they're trying yo say, and if you do understand it still makes no sense in grammar, the words used (and made up), nor the pronounciation. Might be a bit better for German as the language is more popular worldwide and at least you don't have our "G" sound, but I wonder by how much. So I can totally see even a profesional non-native translator wrongly translating the english "cursive" to "kursiv".

  • source
  • parent