As AI tech companies increasingly buy and destroy books to feed to their AI models, Anna's Archive is calling for volunteers to help preserve them for the public record.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 79 points 6 days ago (6 children)

This feels like a "moment where good people took action in history books".

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 58 points 6 days ago

    Anna's is the real deal

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    I have access to a book scanner, but I’m not sure what books need to be scanned, are legal to be scanned and uploaded (I don’t want to get expelled for using a school scanner to do something illegal), or whether there is personally identifiable data in the PDFs it generates (I think I can also save in GIF and maybe PNG?). Is there a beginner’s guide anywhere for all this?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Anna's Archive does have guides for all of that (apart from the legal advice) on their site (use wikipedia to find the right domain).

    I don't think you'd want to do so as a university student unless you want to share the same fate as Aaron Swartz though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Surely at least the stuff out of copyright is kosher to scan and share? Which seems like a good area to focus on if they’re being bought up and destroyed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    Stuff that's out of copyright isn't an issue though.

    The reason AI companies are destroying books is because current US copyright caselaw (most recently the Anthropic lawsuit) doesn't allow books to be copied, but considers it fair use if you transform the format of a legally purchased book (like from print to digital) without creating a new copy. By destroying the original book, they haven't made a copy of it, and so they operate within US law.

    This doesn't apply to public domain books (books that are no longer copyrighted) as you can do whatever you want with public domain content.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 days ago

    Maybe there is a way to do this anonymously? Anna's Archive deals with books new and old, but maybe that 'physical-only' book that has no digital print would be the best place to start?

    I remember no-eyes from #ebooks (IRCHighWay) prioritized recommendations of novels (fiction) to expand their available books, so I think that's the safest type of book to scan?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Im gonna be real chief. Stop worrying about IP legality. Scan and upload everything you can get your hands on, wherever you can reasonably upload it.

    AI companies are violating all copyright laws at all times of day and then destroying the originals, or even DMCA claiming them. You cannot fight that and be worried about legality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 days ago

    I have repurposed an old Xbox external drive and have been ripping every optical disc in my extended family's houses as well as opened it up to friends, anyone who wants to add to the collection is welcome to take from it, all I have to do is bring the drive with me, and they can grab whatever they want off it.

    Fuck IP laws, fuck trademarks, fuck copyright.

    If companies get to arbitrarily decide we can't have access to things (especially if you have given someone money for it), then why should we give a fuck what they think?

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 31 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    Job Opening: Now Hiring

    Description: Destroying the Library of Alexandria

    Compensation: Minimum Wage ($7.25 per hour) plus free daily lunch (2 pizza slices)

    Experience Required: Masters Degree in English, and at least 5 years experience working at a library or book store

    Cover Letter: Please include a personal essay describing how destroying books gives you a personal sense of fulfillment

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 days ago

    Non-profit Copyright Infringement (a.k.a. Piracy) is a Moral Duty, IMHO.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    God the future is depressing

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    Setting aside the bad ethics of destroying rare books, the capitalist in me is very confused: Wouldn't you put in some effort to save the rare books, if only to sell them?

    If you already have the data inside the books, you can put them up for auction, donating to libraries, and so forth. You get money, a reputation for ensuring that they find a home, have a physical backup if the storage drives fail, and so on.

    ...my inner capitalist is disillusioned. 🤨

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    In some interpretation of copyright law, it's considered a "transfer" rather than a "copy" if you destroy the physical original. (Ignore all subsequent copying of the digital version.)

    Actually old and rare books are probably public domain, so that's not an argument.

    Also, most of the books they scan/destroy are low quality trashy novels that won't even sell at thrift stores. But as they are written by humans it is still useful for training models.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago*

    Copyright nowadays is up from the original "25 years" to around "Death of author + 50 years" (a bit more in the US) which is almost always more than 100 years in total, so those "old" books are nowaday almost a century old or more.

    (Well, sorta, if their copyright expired BEFORE new legislation was introduced to extend copyright length as has been regularly done for almost a century, those works didn't got back under copyright after the extension, and as at least in the US copyright extension legislation was seeming driven by wanting to keep the first Mickey Mouse cartoon under copyright, at least in the US said "old" out of copyright books will mainly be from before 1928).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    the problem is also that in "modern" books (like 50s, 60s, 70's and so on) these books themselves also tend to decay and just crumble after a time, due to some sort of process they do to the paper to create it. In order to truly preserve them you'd almost need like some sort of conditioned environment with the same temperature, no sunlight, stuff like that. Its a shame really, then again nothing in the world was meant to last forever.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    AI companys would probably like this. Easier for them to get data.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Nothing will stop corpos from getting data.

    But we can prevent them from paywalling access by having archives of our own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Hmm, "archive of our own" sounds like a great name for something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    There's a ton of ancient documents and books that don't have copies of them (Chinese stuff for example that wasn't all digitized), please tell me data centers aren't seriously trying to take those as well and burn those as well

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago

    I think its a solid bet to say that if there's a price on it, data centers will pay.

    That being said, China is famously protective of their shit. So if its in their hands, its probably safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    We could probably recruit the special collections departments at university libraries to help since they’re already equipped, but how do we identify and procure what needs to be preserved? I kind of assumed most books were already being digitized. As a student I worked on a project digitizing old newspapers and entering basic metadata.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 days ago

    I sometimes try and track down rare books from the 20th century, sometiems less than 75 years old, only to.run into the problem that the only copy is in a rare books collection in a Canadian university or some shit like that

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    The only book I have that might be worth scanning is Knight’s Modern Seamanship 13th edition from ~1960 (was provided to my mom as part of a record-finding request regarding my grandpa’s WW2 deployments, I have no idea why), but if my time in the Navy is any indication, its one of those things that was given during basic to all going through basic (I have a modern copy from 2007 as well), so idk if its a valuable contribution. Probably already in the archive.

    I also have a copy of the joy of cooking from the 70s, and a Betty Crocker cookbook from the 50s, but I assume that’s also already in there. Plus some language textbooks and the like, some bird and geology books, some limnology books, etc. the sort of thing that’s definitely already there.

    I’m willing to scan them, however a person does that, but I’m not willing to destroy them. The old books came from my grandparents, through my mom, and all of those people are long dead. Everything else is from my own education and I use them for reference.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›