all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

What about it's Bluetooth and Wi-Fi capabilities? Covering them only solves the problem of video.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    If you cover the solar panel, it will (eventually) disable the wireless capabilities as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Do we have any copies of an actual Flock contract with any municipality? Why is it so common to resort to physically covering them? Why don't they have the ability to turn them off -- why don't they have full control of them? And why can't they simply remove them*?

    *Oh, Flock doesn't want their property interfered with? That's fine. Store all the cameras and associated equipment in a warehouse somewhere, and Flock can come pick them up whenever they feel like it. (Storage fees will begin to accrue after 5 business days.)

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Cover them in dirt piles

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    Better make those covers Faraday cages... They are still listening to WiFi/Bluetooth/etc

  • source