659
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/workreform@lemmy.world

and I want to be clear - this means no aid to Ukraine either. We are broke as it is.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old

There's no lobbyist money in any of that. Do you expect your politicians to be poor just like you?

[-] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Looking at the polling, that's also what a large contingent of Republicans are saying.

[-] Doom@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

That's what most Americans are saying. The biggest voting block in America is independents. Yet we stupidly keep lettings the elites in the margins have all the air in every room so they can pretend-fight over invented talking points as a distraction so we can't stop them taking our time/money/resources.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago

Top of the list should be prosecuting the fascists and plugging the holes in the legal system that have allowed this country to get into the state it's in. Without that nothing else matters because the next administration will just rip it all out again.

[-] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

But no aid to Ukraine means Europe, your biggest trade partner will be in danger, hence your economy will suffer and you'll become more broke... There's a reason why we have the ICC and why we have foreign aid, cause ww1 and ww2 taught us that peace is way more lucrative then getting sucked into a war... So idk foreign aid makes everyone richer imo

[-] killingspark@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

Uhm, the USA doesn't recognize the ICC

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

cause ww1 and ww2 taught us that peace is way more lucrative then getting sucked into a war

LMAO

Is that really the lesson you think America learned after WWII? Is that why they've been constantly starting illegal wars of aggression across the planet for 80 years?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Mangofunk 3 points 6 days ago

Sure, this might be what the voters are saying. Hell, it’s what some of the elected officials are saying too, but what they say and what they do are two very different things.

Nothing will change until we get money out of politics and neither party is willing to have the discussion, much less act on it.

[-] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Were the only major power without heath care for all, doesn’t make sense. Unless it would suppress wages and or make lots of job loss I’m all for it. I guess the questions, what happens to HSA’s and FSA’s. I have a few thousand in an HSA I’d like not to lose

[-] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I honestly don't think that any entrenched politician has even the slightest capability of "Listening" to people they so obviously hold in contempt for being less well off. The career people are all set for life (yet oddly still greedy enough) to sell anyone out for personal gain.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

This is what most normal earthlings everywhere are saying. Now, what's the holdup I wonder?

[-] mirshafie@europe.pub 2 points 6 days ago

Ah yes, "healthcare over war"

Right up there with classic slogans such as "cake rather than crap" and "better a good night's sleep than getting stabbed in the dick with a screwdriver"

[-] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 2 points 6 days ago

The current state of the Democrats will not listen to that.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
659 points (95.6% liked)

Work Reform

17209 readers
1751 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS