top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 224 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

awesome, then we can remove all the ads, no? because bots don't purchase things, no?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Last year, you’d be correct. This year, bots DO purchase things. They also download and run things. Some marketers have gotten wise and have adjusted SEO and general product advertising to appeal to bots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)
  • [–] 99 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    In the beginning the Universe was created. This had made many people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. – Some Hoopy Frood

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    A lot of sites wouldn't exist without ads, because they want their stuff to be freely-accessible and don't have any other revenue streams. It would also cut off lower income people that couldn't afford to pay.

    The only business models that have really worked online have been:

    1. Ad-supported.
    2. You pay for the service yourself, like a monthly subscription.
    3. Someone else pays for the service for you, for example freemium services (paid users subsidize the free users), a lot of Lemmy servers (admins cover the hosting costs), etc.

    If ads go away, a lot of sites/services would have to become paid services, and smaller ones might just shut down entirely. We'd end up with even more consolidation of the market.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 69 points 3 weeks ago (36 children)

    The weirdest part won’t be bots outnumbering humans: It’ll be bots writing articles for bots, bots summarising them for other bots, bots commenting underneath, and bots measuring the engagement. … Meanwhile three actual humans are somewhere wondering why the internet suddenly feels so empty.

  • source
  • hideshow 38 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    And you wonder why the mega corps want you to give your ID for accessing the internet. Then they can tie your traffic as an actual human and generate ad monies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (34 replies)
    [–] 50 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Hosting shit has become too expensive, and the ads will generate less and less revenue, as it's mostly bots generating clicks and views. This is changing the internet at an incredible pace.

    The worst is that any attempt to create a place free of bots will only become a target for LLM companies to gather clean training data.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Hosting has never been so inexpensive as it is today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

    There seems to be two groups of people:

    People that use services like AWS and pay hundreds (or more) per month: "Wow, hosting is so expensive now!"

    People that host a bunch of stuff on a $40/year VPS: "Wow, hosting is so cheap now!"

    I've got several VPSes with 40Gbps (shared) networking, 8 or 16GB RAM, decent amount of space on RAIDed enterprise NVMe SSDs, fast AMD EPYC CPUs, that cost less than $60/year. 20 years ago before VPS hosting became popular, you'd need to pay at least $100/month for a dedicated server with a consumer CPU, single IDE hard drive, tiny amount of RAM, on a 100Mb/s connection.

    Not to mention being able to host a bunch of stuff at home for cheap with a low-power single-board or mini PC., and Hetzner making dedicated servers very cheap too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago* (8 children)

    There's also the fact that an internet full of bots, AI slop, and privacy risks is making more people pull away from the online world. In our poll, 97% of people said the internet today was a hellscape compared to its early days, and it looks like things are only going to get worse.

    Looks like the cure is inherent in the disease. Anyone else remember the early 90s when Usenet was just text-based fun and then some motherfucker thought it was a grand idea to run ads? I do, and it's been downhill ever since.

    It's sad that it has come to this, but as usual a handful of greedy fuckers have ruined it for the rest of us. (My personal opinion is that big tech could have arrested this downhill slide at any point, even from back in the first days of email spam, but have chosen to monetize it every step of the way instead.)

    Real humans are already individually opting out, one by one, as we each personally get sick of the slop and realize it's just not helping anymore. For myself I'm only on intermittently, I've ditched all social media, Lemmy is all I participate in regularly now beyond the odd comment here and there, and that seems about right for me at this time.

    I adjust it regularly, often just by going offline for days, but I had to see the problem before I could change it. I think that's where a lot of people are, just now seeing it for the first time as a real problem affecting their quality of life directly.

    But like any other addiction, the point of turning is different for everyone. These fuckers on the other end, filling everything with slop and running bots without end, are just speeding it all up.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    These fuckers on the other end, filling everything with slop and running bots without end, are just speeding it all up.

    It's the tragedy of the commons writ large.

    Started off with cooperation and general good behavior between users, passed through corporations bulldozing the place and putting in paid parking for their strip malls, now we're at the Wall-E stage where advertising billboards talk to robots mindlessly doing tasks in abandoned cities for some nebulous "greater good".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I'm reminded of the episode of TNG where they trapped Moriarity in a simulation so he would think he had taken over the ship.

    Maybe we can just have an internet just for billionaires where they have AI produce internet content so they can advertise useless AI products to AI bots run by other billionaires while the rest of us go on with our normal lives in the real world?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    People are just going to get sick of the Internet, if they haven't already, and start to look at it like a necessary evil they have to use to do certain things instead of what it once was which was fun and exciting. It's sad.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I don't host things on the open internet anymore. I have a small set of services I host for a group of friends and family and I set them up with tailscale.

    On the flip side, I've been constantly frustrated because every time I have an idea for some little quality of life tool that involves pulling data from a site I would normally have to browse to directly, I can't do it because everything is captcha'd to all hell.

    I think http/https is dead at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Guess I'll just have to hang out with humans in the physical world.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Locally we have been setting up some mesh systems. Its been fun work. One of the best things about it is:

    1. All traffic is human.
    2. No survalance

    Its in the early phases but its been a sucess so far.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Its in the early phases but its been a sucess so far.

    Mesh networks, you say? I've gotta get in on the ground floor of this new advertising opportunity so I can rake in that sweet early adopter cassssh!

    Claude! Code me up an ad-injection framework for this meshtastic dongle I just bought, stat! Time to get me a big ol' chunk of advertising real estate!

    (sad /s)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    The Metaverse could've been a platform free of AI, offering a protected version of the Internet for people to be themselves. It's kinda where we may be headed anyway. Instead we got this...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Bots don't generate money you dough brains.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I want the bots to start scamming each other now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's crazy! "The round error" was actually my nickname in high school!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Well yeah. Of course it would, given the examples they are talking about.

    It makes sense right? You have a computer, you can program it to do things. I have programmed mine to scrape data or examine websites, and even in some cases to pull entire directories down.

    Now we have an agent do that. In other words a programmed computer tool that is acting on someones behalf using natural language as the question. Note the example given is an AI is looking across as many websites as it can for a review. Or maybe instructions to put something together. Or maybe a list of the highest peaks in the world with the least snowfall. Who knows, but that is endless.

    So this "traffic" is still human driven. Its just using a computer to do the work. I think that changes the perspective a little bit. It is all human intention driven.

    Also, all traffic by http plus every other request is still human, so that is a bit misleading.

    Interestingly, its not like we havent been here before if you look at traffic. The syncing of usenet for a period of time was the largest user of all traffic. So all computer connections, much, much less humans.

    Most traffic today is video, then gaming, than music, financial, screen sharing, p2p, and AI makes up a tiny portion. It just is making a huge number of requests for HTTP, but it is growing, and fast.

    This is neither pro AI, nor anti AI. I am just trying to examine the landscape instead of the over simplistic headline that really is about Cloudflares business model.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Your mum is a rounding error.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I'm looking forward to an open mesh outside the realm of government and corporate control

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    A better metaphor is that the signal to noise ratio is getting so small, that the internet is becoming useless

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

    Why don't we just generate every video imaginable procedurally and host them in space? Get it over with. Every combination of anything. Because that's what this torrent of AI slop videos feels like.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    What does this mean, though. What is the implication?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›