Technology

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] relativelyrobin@mander.xyz 1 point 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

That is a really good idea. I’m not gonna lie. I would love it if I could put like five bucks in a wallet and then it just takes a cent or two when I go to some article rather than having to fight through some local news site trying to get me to pay $9.99 a month to read one piece of rage bait. I’ll pay a nickel or maybe even a dime for a good one.

I know they’re targeting AI agents, but it is only a matter of time. I say roll it out to consumers dude and I know that sounds fucked up, but like I would much rather just pay a nickel or a dime here and there than have ads making it impossible to even read the article. The people will compete on price and I bet it will stay really small for most stuff. It gets creators paid in a similar model to YouTube clicks or Spotify streams, but in a much more direct and equitable way. Google, AI has to pay for the content instead of just handing it over.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

You are conflating micropayments (sufficient to pay creators) with gateway monetization, which would need to be small enough you could still use the internet (lets say thousands of pages a month) but high eough to dissuade scraper bot operators. I am not sure such a price exists. Maybe for some bot operators, but the various AI companies have more money than all regular internet users.

parent

[–] Promethiel@lemmy.world 1 point 3 weeks ago

I'm with you. My concern is that I haven't yet figured out how it's gonna be ruined for private consumers by corporate consumers yet, so can't know how to prepare lol.